To comment on the following update, log in, then open the
issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=20496
------- Additional comments from discoleo openoffice.org Thu Oct 19 09:21:14 -0700 2006 -------
I had a new brainstorming session and would like to expand
on some issues/
Specifications:
What__________| How
is____________| should it be
entered_______| interpreted
==============|=============
SIMPLE NUMBER:
* Number (e.g. 4) => as plain number
* negative number (-3) => as negative plain number
* '+' + 'Number' => as STRING !!!
-- this is currently interpreted as a number, too, but in
categorical data you
may have often categories of, e.g. '+4' which is different
from '4' (think of
grades in histology and so on);
NOTE: when we have only one number [regardless of the
+/-/(or nothing) in front
of that number], the formula does *NOT bring* any
*additional benefit*, so I do
NOT believe that a formula is needed in these situations!!!)
NUMBER FOLLOWED BY OPERATOR:
* 'plain number'+'any operator' => string
* '+' + 'plain number' + 'any operator' => formula
* '-' + 'plain number' + 'any operator' => string
(formula?)
* ('+' or '-') + '-' + 'plain number' + 'any op' =>
formula; strip first +/-
-- advanced: IF "'any operator'..." does
evaluate to *ERROR*, consider string
instead of formula
STRING:
* any string => string
* ('+' OR '-') + STRING
-- IF string evaluates to valid function => formula
-- IF NOT => just a string
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated
notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your
comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/
project_issues.html#notification
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe sc.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help sc.openoffice.org
|