To comment on the following update, log in, then open the
issue:
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=56351
------- Additional comments from mba openoffice.org Sat Aug 25
20:18:15 +0000 2007 -------
Sorry, I fail to see where something "unintuitive"
is done here.
There is a clear bug - two parts of OOo use different naming
schemes for Basic
and document names. So the code that compares what it thinks
is the correct name
of the current document with what the Scripting Framework
thinks is the correct
name of the found document basics must fail.
The only fix possible is to make both sides use the same
naming scheme. What the
heck is unintuitive in doing so?
For me this is the most thoughtless comment I read for a
long time. But it looks
as it at least doesn't damage anything. (SCNR)
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
Please do not reply to this automatically generated
notification from
Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your
comments.
http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/
project_issues.html#notification
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe ui.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help ui.openoffice.org
|