List Info

Thread: problem with OOo file digital signature ( using --with-system-xmlsec ) in m179




problem with OOo file digital signature ( using --with-system-xmlsec ) in m179
user name
2006-08-04 12:35:42
On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 13:34 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> a followup.
> 
> On 8/3/06, Giuseppe Castagno <giuseppe.castagnogmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > my system:
> > FC5, gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat 4.1.1-1)
> 
> I tried with the FC5 stock OOo, from udate and ended up
hitting the
> same bug. I reported this to redhat bugzilla (redhat
i#201305).

Can you try again, but in the ooo-build patch
"system-xmlsec.diff"
change 

PKGCONFIG_MODULES=xmlsec1

to

PKGCONFIG_MODULES=xmlsec1-nss

I believe that's the problem, the cflags are different
between the two
and stuff blows up here as I got them wrong originally.

C.

_______________________________________________
Openoffice mailing list
Openofficelists.ximian.com
h
ttp://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/openoffice
problem with OOo file digital signature ( using --with-system-xmlsec ) in m179
user name
2006-08-04 15:38:45
On 8/4/06, Caolan McNamara <caolanmredhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 13:34 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno
wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > a followup.
> >
> > On 8/3/06, Giuseppe Castagno
<giuseppe.castagnogmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > my system:
> > > FC5, gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat
4.1.1-1)
> >
> > I tried with the FC5 stock OOo, from udate and
ended up hitting the
> > same bug. I reported this to redhat bugzilla
(redhat i#201305).
>
> Can you try again, but in the ooo-build patch
"system-xmlsec.diff"
> change
>
> PKGCONFIG_MODULES=xmlsec1
>
> to
>
> PKGCONFIG_MODULES=xmlsec1-nss
>
> I believe that's the problem, the cflags are different
between the two
> and stuff blows up here as I got them wrong originally.

Sorry, I didn't see your mail until now, I can sure check
it, it will
take some time though.

Be back when done.

-- 
Kind regards,
Giuseppe Castagno
(beppec56)
_______________________________________________
Openoffice mailing list
Openofficelists.ximian.com
h
ttp://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/openoffice
problem with OOo file digital signature ( using --with-system-xmlsec ) in m179
user name
2006-08-04 16:22:33
On 8/4/06, Giuseppe Castagno <giuseppe.castagnogmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Caolan McNamara <caolanmredhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-08-04 at 13:34 +0200, Giuseppe
Castagno wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
............
> >
> > Can you try again, but in the ooo-build patch
"system-xmlsec.diff"
> > change
> >
> > PKGCONFIG_MODULES=xmlsec1
> >
> > to
> >
> > PKGCONFIG_MODULES=xmlsec1-nss
> >
> > I believe that's the problem, the cflags are
different between the two
> > and stuff blows up here as I got them wrong
originally.
>
> Sorry, I didn't see your mail until now, I can sure
check it, it will
> take some time though.

Works like a charm, could see existent and I was able to add
a
signature as well, thank you Caolan !

-- 
Kind regards,
Giuseppe Castagno
_______________________________________________
Openoffice mailing list
Openofficelists.ximian.com
h
ttp://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/openoffice
problem with OOo file digital signature ( using --with-system-xmlsec ) in m179
user name
2006-08-04 21:53:44
Hi,

Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> Works like a charm, could see existent and I was able
to add a
> signature as well, thank you Caolan !

Nice. Thanks.

Changes the patches in HEAD and -2-0.3.

Regards,

Rene
_______________________________________________
Openoffice mailing list
Openofficelists.ximian.com
h
ttp://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/openoffice
problem with OOo file digital signature ( using --with-system-xmlsec ) in m179
user name
2006-08-05 11:29:31
On 8/4/06, Rene Engelhard <renedebian.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> > Works like a charm, could see existent and I was
able to add a
> > signature as well, thank you Caolan !

damn, it seems I was too quick to declare the bug dead, I
built m180
overnight with Rene updatated patch and it appears the
fix's only
partial.

I can see the signatures on a signed OOo file, but when I
try to add a
new signature it chrashes.

Behaviour and backtrace are here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
id=201305#c5

So the current patch it's OK to correct part of the bug.

When yesterday I tried the m179 build tree I only deleted
the binary
in src60-m179/libxmlsec and src60-m179/xmlsecurity, but it
seems it
would have been better if I have done a clean build.

-- 
Kind regards,
Giuseppe Castagno
_______________________________________________
Openoffice mailing list
Openofficelists.ximian.com
h
ttp://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/openoffice
problem with OOo file digital signature ( using --with-system-xmlsec ) in m179
user name
2006-08-10 14:03:03
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 13:29 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Rene Engelhard <renedebian.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> > > Works like a charm, could see existent and I
was able to add a
> > > signature as well, thank you Caolan !
> 
> damn, it seems I was too quick to declare the bug dead,
I built m180
> overnight with Rene updatated patch and it appears the
fix's only
> partial.
> 
> I can see the signatures on a signed OOo file, but when
I try to add a
> new signature it chrashes.

yeah, it only puts off the inevitable, basically I think
it's looking
hopeless to use system xmlsec after all. I give up , really
need to
get the upstream OOo xmlsecurity devs to consider updating
their
internal libxmlsec to a new version and re-implement in
terms of the new
api, especially as much of the new nss work in the later
xmlsecs was
their own upstreamed work.

C.

_______________________________________________
Openoffice mailing list
Openofficelists.ximian.com
h
ttp://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/openoffice
problem with OOo file digital signature ( using --with-system-xmlsec ) in m179
user name
2006-08-10 14:03:03
On Sat, 2006-08-05 at 13:29 +0200, Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> On 8/4/06, Rene Engelhard <renedebian.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Giuseppe Castagno wrote:
> > > Works like a charm, could see existent and I
was able to add a
> > > signature as well, thank you Caolan !
> 
> damn, it seems I was too quick to declare the bug dead,
I built m180
> overnight with Rene updatated patch and it appears the
fix's only
> partial.
> 
> I can see the signatures on a signed OOo file, but when
I try to add a
> new signature it chrashes.

yeah, it only puts off the inevitable, basically I think
it's looking
hopeless to use system xmlsec after all. I give up , really
need to
get the upstream OOo xmlsecurity devs to consider updating
their
internal libxmlsec to a new version and re-implement in
terms of the new
api, especially as much of the new nss work in the later
xmlsecs was
their own upstreamed work.

C.

_______________________________________________
Openoffice mailing list
Openofficelists.ximian.com
h
ttp://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/openoffice
[1-7]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )