[Had accidentally dropped the cross-post. Here it is again.
However,
lets continue on the more general dev porting.openoffice.org
only, I
would say.]
Stephan Bergmann wrote:
> Caolan McNamara wrote:
>> On Thu, 2007-07-26 at 11:04 +0100, Caolan McNamara
wrote:
>>> Ideally we would be able to detect this in
configure, but I don't know
>>> how to test for bustage :-(
>>
>> Maybe this is a test for it, we could use
AC_EGREP_CPP in autoconf to
>> implement it...
>>
>> echo "#include <string>" | g++ -x
c++ -E - | grep "visibility
>> push(default)" > /dev/null
>> if [ "$?" -ne "0" ]; then echo
need to use stlport; else echo system
>> stl safe; fi
>>
>> This says "system stl safe" for me, what
does it say on e.g. the mac
>> gcc ?, and double check on failure that there is no
other sort of
>> visibility pragmas or markup
>> in the -E output that might have caused a false
negative.
>
> Says "system stl safe" on Mac OS X 10.4
(which uses Apple's GCC 4.0.1).
>
> I will be on vacation for one week, but will try to
remember to pick up
> on this again afterwards...
>
> -Stephan
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe porting.openoffice.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help porting.openoffice.org
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe porting.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help porting.openoffice.org
|