Re: Name Changes...

>>>>> "BW" == Bruno Wolff
<brunowolff.to> writes:

BW> Note if you are worried about this you arlso need to
be careful
BW> about checking to see if a domain name is available.
If you check
BW> with a registry, there are somne shady registries
that get to see
BW> the request and may buy the name on speculation if
you don't buy
BW> it right away. Checking to see if there is an NS
record for a
BW> domain should give you a pretty good idea about its
availablity
BW> and seems less like to come to the attention of
speculators.

Use whois. That will tell you authoritatively, and if the
.com (or
whichever TLD you're going for) registrars are crooked, you
have lost
anyway.


/Benny



_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev

> BW> Note if you are worried about this you arlso
need to be careful
> BW> about checking to see if a domain name is
available. If you check
> (...)
>
> /Benny

Benny is right, proposed name should also need to be
available. Also, about 
the most voted name,
it may be my interpretation, but the name CallWeaver sucks.
Sounds like a 
proprietary brand.

We need a name, but we're developers, engineers. Ask your
wives, your 
children. Branding (even in
terms of an Open Source organization, in order to receive
donations, etc.) 
is a very important part
of the project's development.

Regards,
Ariel

>
> _______________________________________________
> Openpbx-dev mailing list
> Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev