Re: more names

Callmunger ? 

>>> Leo Ann Boon <leodatvoiz.com> 03/08/07
5:36 PM >>>
CtRiX wrote:
> Terry Moore-Read wrote:
>
> After asking to quote a bit better...
>   
>> So drop GNU to avoid confusion with FSF Projects
but keep weaver so it can be confused with an Adobe product
?
>>
>> It's probably best to keep away from derivations of
trademarked names all together.
>>   
>>     
> Weaver has nothing to do with Dreamweaver and related
trademarks as well 
> as Point has nothing to do with powerpoint and related
trademarks as 
> well as Fox has nothing to do with firefox or firebird
and related 
> trademarks.
>
> We are not dropping GNU because it creates confusion,
but because we 
> have nothing to do with them.
>
> The comparison with Adobe is silly because we are not
renaming openpbx 
> to AdobePBX.
>
>   
How about VoxToaster?

Leo

_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev


--
This message has been scanned for viruses
and dangerous content by Lukins & Annis, P.S.

NOTICE: This email may contain confidential or
privileged material, and is intended solely
for use by the above referenced recipient. Any
review, copying, printing, disclosure, distri-
bution, or any other use, is strictly prohibited.

If you are not the recipient, and believe that
you have received this in error, please notify
the sender and delete the copy you received.

Thank You!

_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev

Hi ?PBX-Fans,

here are some other (crazy) name ideas:

PBmiX, PBmiXer or PBXer (Privacy Branche eXchange mixer)

multiPBX

infinityPBX

iPBX, i-PBX, I-pbx, Ipbx (infinity, intelligent, innovative
PBX)

xPBX

ultraPBX

PBXline


Regards
	Bastian

Terry Moore-Read schrieb:
> Callmunger ? 
> 
>>>> Leo Ann Boon <leodatvoiz.com> 03/08/07
5:36 PM >>>
> CtRiX wrote:
>> Terry Moore-Read wrote:
>>
>> After asking to quote a bit better...
>>   
>>> So drop GNU to avoid confusion with FSF
Projects but keep weaver so it can be confused with an Adobe
product ?
>>>
>>> It's probably best to keep away from
derivations of trademarked names all together.
>>>   
>>>     
>> Weaver has nothing to do with Dreamweaver and
related trademarks as well 
>> as Point has nothing to do with powerpoint and
related trademarks as 
>> well as Fox has nothing to do with firefox or
firebird and related 
>> trademarks.
>>
>> We are not dropping GNU because it creates
confusion, but because we 
>> have nothing to do with them.
>>
>> The comparison with Adobe is silly because we are
not renaming openpbx 
>> to AdobePBX.
>>
>>   
> How about VoxToaster?
> 
> Leo
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openpbx-dev mailing list
> Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
> 
> 
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses
> and dangerous content by Lukins & Annis, P.S.
> 
> NOTICE: This email may contain confidential or
> privileged material, and is intended solely
> for use by the above referenced recipient. Any
> review, copying, printing, disclosure, distri-
> bution, or any other use, is strictly prohibited.
> 
> If you are not the recipient, and believe that
> you have received this in error, please notify
> the sender and delete the copy you received.
> 
> Thank You!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openpbx-dev mailing list
> Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
> 


____________
Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
Version: AVK 17.3136 from 08.03.2007
Virus news: www.antiviruslab.com


_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev

And because I am not seeing much in the way of actual
development
discussion, I am just going to put this here because
everyone seems to
be paying attention. My thought is...

Since Asterisk and an asterisk... OpenPBX is based on
Asterisk, so what
about:

Solidus

Baring that, I think I am going to dig up the code for that
random
online-name generator, get some of the local brew and see
what I can
come up with.




On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 01:18 +0100, Bastian Schern wrote:
> Hi ?PBX-Fans,
> 
> here are some other (crazy) name ideas:
> 
> PBmiX, PBmiXer or PBXer (Privacy Branche eXchange
mixer)
> 
> multiPBX
> 
> infinityPBX
> 
> iPBX, i-PBX, I-pbx, Ipbx (infinity, intelligent,
innovative PBX)
> 
> xPBX
> 
> ultraPBX
> 
> PBXline
> 
> 
> Regards
> 	Bastian
> 
> Terry Moore-Read schrieb:
> > Callmunger ? 
> > 
> >>>> Leo Ann Boon <leodatvoiz.com> 03/08/07 5:36 PM >>>
> > CtRiX wrote:
> >> Terry Moore-Read wrote:
> >>
> >> After asking to quote a bit better...
> >>   
> >>> So drop GNU to avoid confusion with FSF
Projects but keep weaver so it can be confused with an Adobe
product ?
> >>>
> >>> It's probably best to keep away from
derivations of trademarked names all together.
> >>>   
> >>>     
> >> Weaver has nothing to do with Dreamweaver and
related trademarks as well 
> >> as Point has nothing to do with powerpoint and
related trademarks as 
> >> well as Fox has nothing to do with firefox or
firebird and related 
> >> trademarks.
> >>
> >> We are not dropping GNU because it creates
confusion, but because we 
> >> have nothing to do with them.
> >>
> >> The comparison with Adobe is silly because we
are not renaming openpbx 
> >> to AdobePBX.
> >>
> >>   
> > How about VoxToaster?
> > 
> > Leo
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openpbx-dev mailing list
> > Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
> > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
> > 
> > 
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses
> > and dangerous content by Lukins & Annis, P.S.
> > 
> > NOTICE: This email may contain confidential or
> > privileged material, and is intended solely
> > for use by the above referenced recipient. Any
> > review, copying, printing, disclosure, distri-
> > bution, or any other use, is strictly prohibited.
> > 
> > If you are not the recipient, and believe that
> > you have received this in error, please notify
> > the sender and delete the copy you received.
> > 
> > Thank You!
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openpbx-dev mailing list
> > Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
> > http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
> > 
> 
> 
> ____________
> Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> Version: AVK 17.3136 from 08.03.2007
> Virus news: www.antiviruslab.com
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Openpbx-dev mailing list
> Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
> http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev
_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev

beau hargis wrote:
> And because I am not seeing much in the way of actual
development
> discussion, I am just going to put this here because
everyone seems to
> be paying attention. My thought is...
>
> Since Asterisk and an asterisk... OpenPBX is based on
Asterisk, so what
> about:
>
> Solidus
>
>   
Ericsson has already taken that for their CTI solution.

Leo

_______________________________________________
Openpbx-dev mailing list
Openpbx-devopenpbx.org
http://lists.openpbx.org/mailman/listinfo/openpbx-dev