> note that 3-DES is now referred to as TDEA
> should this perhaps be included in rfc 2440 when 3-DES
is
> mentioned?
> i.e.
> when 3-DES is first mentioned,
> it should be referred to as 3-DES(also known as TDEA)
They're not the same. There is DES and DEA, just as there
is DSA and
DSS. In each pair, there is an Algorithm and a Standard. The
standard
is the algorithm plus other stuff. In the case of DES, it
specifies
that the low bit of each byte (excuse me, octet) of the key
is a
parity bit (and possibly other stuff I don't remember).
Everyone uses
DES, not DEA. What we use is 3DES, not TDEA. In the case of
DSS, we
*do* mean DSA because there were people who wanted (for
example) to
use RIPE-MD/160 with DSA, not SHA-1, as DSS.
I suppose we could call it "TDES," but it's
been called "3DES" or
"Triple-DES" for ages. If all of a sudden we
start calling it TDES,
there will be many people who will rightly mutter,
"TDES? What the %
$ !
is TDES? Oh, *3DES*, why didn't you say so?"
Jon
|