hi thomas!
thanks for the insight! i'll give it a try next time i'm tempted to
use swhx ;) sounds sweet!
matthias: i absolutely understand your decision *g* same for
me; but swhx and haxe aren't that difficult to understand the
biggest problem they have is, that it SEEMS to be complex...
just wanted to make this clear; my concern was that swhx might
disappear if no one is going to use it. i'm glad that this doesn't seem to be the case