Is the Open Font License OSI approved ?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Is http:
//www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical the current
list ?
The date on the page is: Submitted by Michael Tiemann on
Mon, 2006-09-18
12:56. :: ie around a year old.

And is the OFL as is at
http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/p
age.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=OFL_web
OSI approved ?

:Sankarshan


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


iD8DBQFHCGP4XQZpNTcrCzMRAk4yAJ9FbuT/1A4avL3Z3o0+jhNDhp0N6QCf
fcPQ
Pn8MrIJk6s0fS8FrfevHqj4=
=KVWU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Sankarshan Mukhopadhyay wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Is http:
//www.opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical the current
list ?
> The date on the page is: Submitted by Michael Tiemann
on Mon, 2006-09-18
> 12:56. :: ie around a year old.

There have been some updates.  See http://opensour
ce.org/licenses/status .

> And is the OFL as is at
> http://scripts.sil.org/cms/scripts/p
age.php?site_id=nrsi&item_id=OFL_web
> OSI approved ?

No, I don't think so.  It appears to be OSD-compliant,
thanks to the
loophole in OSD #1 (which doesn't require that the software
can be sold
/alone/).

Matt Flaschen