Chris Zumbrunn scripsit:
> Again though, I think this isn't our problem. It's a
problem between
> Microsoft and that developer. It's nothing that stands
in the way of
> approving the licenses.
Indeed. A quick google for "licensed under the
MPL" pulls up a dozen
products that use the Mozilla Public License, and nobody has
ever
alleged customer confusion between those products and any
trademark
of the Mozilla Foundation.
--
John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan
cowan ccil.org
All "isms" should be "wasms". --Abbie
|