Hi Alexander,
On Oct 18, 2007, at 10:43 AM, Alexander Terekhov wrote:
> (Subject changed: back on "license-discuss"
topicality  )
I'm sorry, I honestly don't see how this in
"on-topic". Please email
me directly so we can sort this out.
-- Ernie P.
OSI Board Observer
>
>
> http://pt
.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Licen%C3%A7a_de_software_li
vre&diff=cur&oldid=7241703
>
> "Em outras palavras, uma licença de software livre
é um contrato que
> garante aos usuários de um software livre a permissão
para remover
> qualquer aspecto de propriedade intelectual do software
que, caso
> contrário, descaracterizaria sua condição de software
livre."
>
> http://ba
belfish.altavista.com/babelfish/tr
>
> "In other words, a license of free software is a
contract that
> guarantees to the users of a free software the
permission to remove
> any aspect of copyright of the software that, in case
that contrary,
> would deprive of characteristics its condition of free
software."
>
> is (well, now actually was) <quote> actually so
factually wrong that
> it can only have been written by people who are agains
Free Software,
> and want to spread disinformation. </quote>
>
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnu-mi
sc-discuss/2007-10/msg00100.html
>
> And so he quickly patched it.
>
> While refusing to give any comments when confronted
with
>
> http://www.uscfc.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Horn/99/RTCOMP.h
tm
>
> may I note.
>
> regards,
> alexander.
>
> --
> "To show the falsity of 'PJ''s claims, in most
cases I need look no
> further
> than Groklaw itself. 'PJ' wants more journalists to use
the site as a
> resource, so I'll do just that. Below are excerpts from
my story
> that 'PJ'
> says are incorrect, followed by 'PJ''s characterization
of them, and
> my
> response -- at times taken directly from
Groklaw."
|