The spec. process ...

Hi Michael et. all,

Michael Meeks schrieb:
> 	I think you fail to engage with the problem I am
trying to address.
> 	Let's re-examine my use-case *emphasis* added.

we haven't changed the process of handling FEATURE tasks
(most of them 
which need a specification are this type of issue).

We only have written down what others do and where we failed
*to create* 
(high quality) *specifications*. Also we have described who
is intended 
readership and why. Also some helpful words about how to
start.


+------->------>------>------ FEATURE
------>------->------->
+- idea -|- i-Team -|- writing spec -|- impl. spec
-|-......>
                      ================

So, we have only worked on "writing spec" (===)
and not on the FEATURE 
(integration) process.

Hopefully now you see that "Jack's" problem has
not been resolved with 
our documentation.

You have written [1] that "other teams outside Sun
cannot, or will not 
follow this formal process in order." That was the
intention to remove 
it because it has nothing to do Sun or not and also not with
the problem 
we have tried to resolve with writing down this
documentation.

Maybe it is now more clear that you have typed words at the
wrong place.

Cu,
Jogi

[1] 
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/mwiki/index.php?title=C
ategory%3ASpecification&diff=14719&oldid=14673
-- 
Sun Microsystems GmbH     Joerg Sievers
Nagelsweg 55              Quality Assurance Engineer
D-20097 Hamburg           OpenOffice.org CWS Gatekeeper
http://www.sun.de


------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribespecs.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helpspecs.openoffice.org