Hi Christian,
you are probably aware of the fact that the history
section is missing
in the wiki template. This is a very important part of each
spec because
it tells the reader in a comprehensive way the history
(aha!) of the
spec. Authors, timeline, updates, status changes are way
important --
that's why this section was part of the ODT spec in the
first place, right?
Please add the history to the wiki spec as well. -- Or
remove it from
the ODT and be prepared for another big discussion 
thanks a lot
Matthias
Christian Jansen wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> So it is done. I've transfered the ODF based template
to the OOo Wiki.
> Therefore it would be very helpful if you review the
following sites.
>
>
> * The template:
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Specific
ation_Template
>
> * The help
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Spe
cification_Template_Help
>
> * Infos & Rules
> http://wik
i.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Category:Specification#OpenOf
fice.org_Software_Specifications
>
>
> * Wiki-Code Templates for specifying UI-elements
>
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/UI-Elements
>
> * The example spec (currently work in progress)
> http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Specifica
tion_Example
>
> What is also on the plate?
>
> If we agreed on the template structure I'd like to move
forward by
> creating a new "home" for the specifications.
>
> Currently I'm investigating if it makes sense to have
an owne namespace
> on the wiki.
>
>
> Regarding the ODF-Template.
> Personally I believe that lots of people want to
continue writing
> specifications by using the 'classic' ODF based
template. Anyhow, I
> suggest that specifications based on that template are
also stored in
> the wiki.
>
> Feedback, suggestions for improvement are welcome.
>
> Thanks,
> Christian
>
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe specs.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helpspecs.openoffice.org
|