Matthias Müller-Prove <Matthias.Mueller-Prove sun.com> writes:
> any solution is manual.
>
No.
> It is the author who knows best what she just did. I
argue for the
> convenience of the reader.
>
I agree to the former, but find that it does not have
anything to do
with the latter. My point is simply that relying on manual
steps will
break - even more so, when the process leaves our small,
controlled
environment.
> CVS and MediaWikis are not sufficient in this respect.
Have you ever
> seen a history entry (CVS or MediaWiki) telling you
what section, what
> lines have changes, and for what reason? This is the
stuff that
> matters for the iTeam.
>
Huh? Yes, I'm reading CVS diffs all day, and that's exactly
what they
are telling me - who changed which line for what revision.
And for
MediaWiki, I find this even more easier. What's wrong with
this diff:
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/mwi
ki/index.php?title=Build_up_a_Vibrant_User_Experience_Commun
ity&diff=20533&oldid=20532
?
BTW, the reason for a change can (and should) be given in
the commit
summary.
Cheers,
-- Thorsten
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe specs.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help specs.openoffice.org
|