Hi Matthias,
I agree with Eike and Thorsten, the MediaWiki does a much
better job
here than any manual solution can.
Matthias Müller-Prove schrieb:
> A useful summary for your example above would be:
"Correcting links to
> [[User Interface Guidrline]]"
Sorry, but I don't consider this a change to be remembered
at all. If
the links were misspelled and now are correct, that is fine,
but
posterity does not need to know, or could you mention a use
case for
this example? However, MediaWiki does even remember that.
> Less than 50 characters. The wiki diff page uses more
than 900
> characters for the same message.
But with no effort, but adding a good sumary.
> I argue for some more effort on the side of the author
to save a
> significant amount of time on the reader's side.
The most important readers are developers and QA, and most
times they
will want to know nothing but the latest revision.
Anyway ...
the MediaWiki solution is technically perfect. Regarding
content, it
makes IMHO much more sense for the author to add a
meaningful
version-comment, than to write a text that repeats part of
the
information the wiki provides anyway.
Nikolai
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe specs.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-helpspecs.openoffice.org
|