Hi Frank,
thanks for your feedback. Find some comments and answers
inline.
Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote On 03/14/06
09:17,:
> When you introduced the preliminary version some time
ago, there have
> been raised concerns that we need a document
management system for our
> specifications, else they will soon rot and become
out-of-date.
We're aware of this issue not only thanks to your feedback.
> In the process of re-thinking our specification
handling, did your team
> also address this issue? I really hope that the answer
is "Yes, next
> week the server goes online." ,
We're addressing things step by step. And this point
becomes a lot more
important now that other things have been fixed. I wish I
could already
give you your desired answer but currently I can't.
But: Yes we are aware of this probem and will address it!
> since it's my *strong* belief that any
> sophisticated document template will be of no use at
all, in the long
> term, if we don't solve the problem of specification
document management.
There's always one more problem left to be solved ;) But
that doesn't
mean that all already existing solutions to other problems
are
completely useless IMO.
Besides or goal was simplification so I'm a little bit
amazed to see
that you call the new specification template
'sophisticated'. Just
because the new template contains more content than the old
version
doesn't mean its more complicated compared to the former
version.
Further more its possible to hide nearly every help directly
embedded
into the document. So basically the new template consist of
just 2 pages!
Regards,
Tino
------------------------------------------------------------
---------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe specs.openoffice.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help specs.openoffice.org
|