Desktop memory usage

On Sunday 10 September 2006 15:43, Lubos Lunak wrote:
>  Hello,
>
>  I finally found some time to put together something
that I had measured
> already quite a while ago. And I think the results are
interesting. But
> before I post this somewhere publically I'd appreciate
if somebody could at
> least quickly check it. I'd hate to see this trashed
by people just because
> of some silly stupid mistake that I've managed to
overlook. It still needs
> some final polishing but otherwise I right now consider
it complete, so in
> case you see something wrong, missing or not clear with
it, please tell me.

Some nitpicking:
filemanager for WMaker: midnight commander, maybe xemacs as
editor ?
The tables with the numbers are not very clear.
I guess that first number is the number reported by exmap,
the number in 
brackets is the number from free ? Which difference is
"diff" in every case ?

Bye
Alex
-- 
Work: alexander.neundorf AT jenoptik.com - http://www.jenoptik-los.de

Home: neundorf AT kde.org                - http://www.kde.org
      alex AT neundorf.net               - http://www.neundorf.net
_______________________________________________
Kde-optimize mailing list
Kde-optimizekde.org
ht
tps://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-optimize

On Sunday 10 September 2006 23:52, Alexander Neundorf wrote:
> On Sunday 10 September 2006 15:43, Lubos Lunak wrote:
> >  Hello,
> >
> >  I finally found some time to put together
something that I had measured
> > already quite a while ago. And I think the results
are interesting. But
> > before I post this somewhere publically I'd
appreciate if somebody could
> > at least quickly check it. I'd hate to see this
trashed by people just
> > because of some silly stupid mistake that I've
managed to overlook. It
> > still needs some final polishing but otherwise I
right now consider it
> > complete, so in case you see something wrong,
missing or not clear with
> > it, please tell me.
>
> Some nitpicking:
> filemanager for WMaker: midnight commander, maybe
xemacs as editor ?

 I'd say plain shell is more common case for this kind of
users than mc, 
guessing from knowing a couple of them. As for xemacs, it's
not my intention 
to show that Window Maker is more heavy than Xfce > .
Seriously, this 
doesn't matter that much for these benchmarks.

> The tables with the numbers are not very clear.
> I guess that first number is the number reported by
exmap, the number in
> brackets is the number from free ? Which difference is
"diff" in every case
> ?

 It's mentioned in the text, but yes, I guess I should make
that much more 
explicit.

-- 
Lubos Lunak
KDE developer
------------------------------------------------------------
--
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.   e-mail: l.lunaksuse.cz , l.lunakkde.org
Lihovarska 1060/12   tel: +420 284 028 972
190 00 Prague 9      fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic       http//www.suse.cz
_______________________________________________
Kde-optimize mailing list
Kde-optimizekde.org
ht
tps://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-optimize