I am running OCFSv2 in production in 2 month, and in staging
for approx 6
month. While it is stable in _normal_ conditions, failure
tests shows, that
it don't survive many failure scenarios (causing all servers
to reboot, or
switching to readonly mode). So, it is not a simple choice -
use it or not.
But it's true - current OCFS is much more stable, esp. in
SLES9 SP3 (and
updated kernels).
----- Original Message -----
From: "Silviu Marin-Caea"
<silviu_marin-caea fieldinsights.ro>
To: <suse-oracle suse.com>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: [suse-oracle] re: Possibly migrating from
Solaris to Suse + ASM
???
> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 23:26, Alexei_Roudnev
wrote:
> > You have not other choice in case of RAC (OCFSv2
is not
> > stable enough for the primary database;
>
> We've been running with OCFS2 in production for almost
a year. While we
had
> some very nasty problems at the beginning, there were
all gone after
> upgrading to OCFS2 1.2.1. And now the SUSE kernel has
1.2.3. So OCFS2 is
a
> choice.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribe suse.com
> For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-help suse.com
> Please see http://www.suse.com/oracl
e/ before posting
>
>
--
To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribe suse.com
For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-help suse.com
Please see http://www.suse.com/oracl
e/ before posting
|