List Info

Thread: Suse 10 vs SUN E4500 - ORION io tool does not match iostat output




Suse 10 vs SUN E4500 - ORION io tool does not match iostat output
user name
2007-04-16 15:24:58
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Folks,

I'm wondering if someone can help me understand the output
of oracle's ORION I/O calibration tool.
I'm comparing a SuSE 10 Dell 6800 /IBM DS4400 (4 dual core
Xeon 2.60GHz)
             vs Solaris 5.8 E4500/IBM DS4400 (12 x 400Mhz
cpus).

Both the devices used are a RAID 10 configuration of 24 x
36GB 15000 rpm drives.

I've made sure the controllers are setup the same, and
tested only small random reads (8k reads).
The problem I have is that the IOPS rate for the Solaris
machine is much greater than Suse, but when I compare
iostat outputs it shows that the SuSe throughput is far
better... which is what I expect, since the E4500 is a
10yr+
machine with slower bus speeds.

I'm trying to understand why the results are conflicting,
and/or if this is just a reporting issue by Orion and/or
iostat differences between Sun/SuSe.  You will notice below
that  ORION reports the IOPS for the Sun test at
29,462 vs 2,539, but the iostat output shows differently.

Does anyone have an idea of why the ORION IOPS does not
match up with the iostat output on the Sun test?

- -peter



iostat on linux
===============

Device:    r/s rsec/s     rkB/s   avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await 
svctm  %util
sde    2519.20 40307.20  20153.60 16.00    55.85    22.10 
0.40  99.80
sde    2527.07 40433.17  20216.58 16.00    56.87    22.52 
0.40  99.86
sde    2535.10 40561.60  20280.80 16.00    56.92    22.47 
0.39  99.96
sde    2534.70 40555.20  20277.60 16.00    56.92    22.37 
0.39  99.96
sde    2534.80 40556.80  20278.40 16.00    56.93    22.51 
0.39  99.96
sde    2539.16 40626.57  20313.29 16.00    59.87    23.49 
0.39  99.86
sde    2523.50 40376.00  20188.00 16.00    56.93    22.45 
0.40  99.96
sde    2508.10 40129.60  20064.80 16.00    58.72    23.47 
0.40  99.80
sde    2517.90 40286.40  20143.20 16.00    59.92    23.79 
0.40  99.96
sde    2528.10 40449.60  20224.80 16.00    59.93    23.71 
0.40  99.96

ORION report: Maximum Small IOPS=2539  Small=48

iostat on Sun
==============

  r/s     kr/s  wait actv asvc_t  %w  %b device
559.4   4475.2   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  22 sd225
575.4   4603.2   0.0  0.3    0.4   0  23 sd225
568.7   4549.5   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  22 sd225
578.9   4631.2   0.0  0.3    0.4   0  23 sd225
528.9   4226.5   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  21 sd225
537.9   4303.2   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  21 sd225
533.4   4267.2   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  21 sd225
546.5   4372.0   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  21 sd225


ORION report: Maximum Small IOPS=29462 
Small=48
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


iD8DBQFGI9uaoyy5QBCjoT0RAnXjAKCLhZ0o/4NAlov/nPhCzvg+NZWy6gCb
Bhbh
osEImLKFOdDyheaESgM19UU=
=YHwV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribesuse.com
For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-helpsuse.com
Please see http://www.suse.com/oracl
e/ before posting


RE: Suse 10 vs SUN E4500 - ORION io tool does not match iostat output
user name
2007-04-17 12:49:32
Is one buffered and the other not? Perhaps if you mount the
4500
filesystem with -forcedirectio to see what that does ?
-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Santos [mailto:psantoscheetahmail.com] 
Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 1:25 PM
To: suse-oraclesuse.com
Subject: [suse-oracle] Suse 10 vs SUN E4500 - ORION io tool
does not
match iostat output

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Folks,

I'm wondering if someone can help me understand the output
of oracle's
ORION I/O calibration tool.
I'm comparing a SuSE 10 Dell 6800 /IBM DS4400 (4 dual core
Xeon 2.60GHz)
             vs Solaris 5.8 E4500/IBM DS4400 (12 x 400Mhz
cpus).

Both the devices used are a RAID 10 configuration of 24 x
36GB 15000 rpm
drives.

I've made sure the controllers are setup the same, and
tested only small
random reads (8k reads).
The problem I have is that the IOPS rate for the Solaris
machine is much
greater than Suse, but when I compare
iostat outputs it shows that the SuSe throughput is far
better... which
is what I expect, since the E4500 is a 10yr+
machine with slower bus speeds.

I'm trying to understand why the results are conflicting,
and/or if this
is just a reporting issue by Orion and/or
iostat differences between Sun/SuSe.  You will notice below
that  ORION
reports the IOPS for the Sun test at
29,462 vs 2,539, but the iostat output shows differently.

Does anyone have an idea of why the ORION IOPS does not
match up with
the iostat output on the Sun test?

- -peter



iostat on linux
===============

Device:    r/s rsec/s     rkB/s   avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await 
svctm  %util
sde    2519.20 40307.20  20153.60 16.00    55.85    22.10 
0.40  99.80
sde    2527.07 40433.17  20216.58 16.00    56.87    22.52 
0.40  99.86
sde    2535.10 40561.60  20280.80 16.00    56.92    22.47 
0.39  99.96
sde    2534.70 40555.20  20277.60 16.00    56.92    22.37 
0.39  99.96
sde    2534.80 40556.80  20278.40 16.00    56.93    22.51 
0.39  99.96
sde    2539.16 40626.57  20313.29 16.00    59.87    23.49 
0.39  99.86
sde    2523.50 40376.00  20188.00 16.00    56.93    22.45 
0.40  99.96
sde    2508.10 40129.60  20064.80 16.00    58.72    23.47 
0.40  99.80
sde    2517.90 40286.40  20143.20 16.00    59.92    23.79 
0.40  99.96
sde    2528.10 40449.60  20224.80 16.00    59.93    23.71 
0.40  99.96

ORION report: Maximum Small IOPS=2539  Small=48

iostat on Sun
==============

  r/s     kr/s  wait actv asvc_t  %w  %b device
559.4   4475.2   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  22 sd225
575.4   4603.2   0.0  0.3    0.4   0  23 sd225
568.7   4549.5   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  22 sd225
578.9   4631.2   0.0  0.3    0.4   0  23 sd225
528.9   4226.5   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  21 sd225
537.9   4303.2   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  21 sd225
533.4   4267.2   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  21 sd225
546.5   4372.0   0.0  0.2    0.4   0  21 sd225


ORION report: Maximum Small IOPS=29462 
Small=48
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org


iD8DBQFGI9uaoyy5QBCjoT0RAnXjAKCLhZ0o/4NAlov/nPhCzvg+NZWy6gCb
Bhbh
osEImLKFOdDyheaESgM19UU=
=YHwV
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribesuse.com
For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-helpsuse.com
Please see http://www.suse.com/oracl
e/ before posting


--
To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribesuse.com
For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-helpsuse.com
Please see http://www.suse.com/oracl
e/ before posting


[1-2]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )