I do *not* want any kind of virtual buffering.
Reasons:
1: in all too many circumstances in the other os i've seen
text cursors
of the virtual buffer being placed before the mouse one and
if a link
isn't responding when you hit return or spacebar or
something and you
try to rout the mouse to the virtual cursor and it fails,
you're screwed.
2: that dreaded forms mode, need i say more?
3: if you want to make your own web pages, it's virtually
impossible to
see the web page as it's really going to look, unless of
course there's
some trick i don't know about, due to the all too forgiving
rendering of
web pages, that makes you think you make a very good page
when in
reality you aren't.
These are only some of the reasons why there in my opinion
shouldn't be
any virtual buffering if it's at all possible to avoid it.
I am impressed so far with how Firefox works with the not
very latest
but still a rather late Orca. I think that navigation is
good with the
orca controled cursor navigation. Only trouble right now,
and i wonder
if it's an a11y thing or something else is that when one
fills in a form
on a web page and then presses the "submit" button
FF crashes.
/Krister
Erik Heil wrote:
> Hi their. Can someone sum up the experiences using the
current Firefox
> 3.0 with the latest Orca checked out of SVN? If I
would have some input
> though, I would recomend something similar to a virtual
buffer. i.e. the
> page content is rendered. I do know for a fact that
Firefox exposes
> enough of the DOM tree to make this possible. Is
something for Orca being
> planned? Reason why I ask is that if its not, we
should try and come up
> with the best way to navigate page content. Failure to
do this may
> present problems in the long run. So what are your
thoughs and concerns?
> Would be interested to know.
> --Erik
>
>
> On Sat, 10 Mar 2007, hermann wrote:
>
>> Date: Sat, 10 Mar 2007 15:04:15 +0100
>> From: hermann <steppenwolf2 onlinehome.de>
>> To: Lorenzo Taylor <lorenzotaylor.homelinux.net>
>> Cc: orca-listgnome.org
>> Subject: Re: Orca My experiences with FireFox 3.0
and
>>
>> Hello Lorenzo,
>> regarding the radio buttons: It is as you
discribed, you have to use the
>> flat review. But I found another way, which is also
not very
>> comfortable, but does its job: You can click on the
selected button, and
>> you will open the whole range of radio buttons;
place the cursor on the
>> button you want to select, and then press space
bar. I did so on the
>> German Google page, where you can select whether
you want the results of
>> the search presented from whole web, those in
German or only sites from
>> Germany. The radio buttons are placed
horizontally.
>> Navigation with the cursor: It works only in a
reliable way, if you are
>> in an area of the same elements, either a text
block or a navigation bar
>> containing a variety of links etc. You should
realise that a lot of
>> websites are multicolumned, and it does not make
much sense, if you get
>> it read to you across all columns; for example
think of newspaper
>> homepages. That's also the reason, why copying them
to Gedit isn't
>> always a good idea.
>> I still prefere a kind of reading mode, either in a
buffer or as another
>> solution, where the page is presented in a text
only style.
>> Regards
>> Hermann
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Orca-list mailing list
>> Orca-listgnome.org
>> http
://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
>>
>
> eheilsdf.lonestar.org
> SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org
> _______________________________________________
> Orca-list mailing list
> Orca-listgnome.org
> http
://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-listgnome.org
http
://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
|
