sorry I should use the new subject, though I replied the
mail under the
old subject.
-Evan
Evan Yan wrote:
> Yes, I can confirm this. It's really a regression of
firefox.
> We will work on this.
> Please use the nightly build before the regression took
place as a
> temporary solution.
>
> Thanks,
> Evan
>
> hermann wrote:
>
>> Hello Lorenzo,
>> I made the same experiences, but with FF3 from the
11th of March. The
>> Saturday's version worked brilliant. I didn't make
your test to run FF
>> without Orca, so I concluded that's something wrong
with the latest
>> nightly FF.
>> To resume our weekend's discussion Imust say that
it doesn't make much
>> sense to argue over virtual buffers or other
accessibility things as
>> long as Orca and FF3 are that unstable. The main
goal should be to
>> create stable programs, both Orca and FF alike.
>> Note to Krishnakant: I strongly recommend to
install a text based
>> browser, or to use the installed w3m, since we have
a long way to go
>> toward real accessibility of webpages.
>> Regards
>> Hermann
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Orca-list mailing list
>> Orca-list gnome.org
>> http
://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Orca-list mailing list
> Orca-list gnome.org
> http
://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
>
_______________________________________________
Orca-list mailing list
Orca-list gnome.org
http
://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/orca-list
|