Well, yeah, but they read this newsgroup so they should see
this. Just
in case I'll copy pdt-dev eclipse.org too.
If you reassign the bug to PDT or paste its number here, we
can make
sure they know about this item.
Nick
David Muir wrote:
> Isn't this something that the PDT people should be
doing?
>> FYI, this can be fixed with the
forceContextQualifier or by building from tags instead of
HEAD.
>> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Modeling_Project_Relen
g/Building#Built_features_.26_plugins_have_.22HEAD.22_in_the
ir_version_qualifier
>> David Muir wrote:
>>> I submitted a bug report with Equinox and this
is their reply:
>>> --- Comment #2 from John Arthorne
<john_arthorne ca.ibm.com> 2008-07-16 14:05:58 -0400
---
>>> From looking at the PDT nightly builds, I can
see they use a version number of
>>> "2.0.0.HEAD". This also means that
every build has the same version number, so
>>> p2 can't make any sense of it. They need to
have unique version numbers per
>>> build for install/update technology to work
properly.
--
Nick Boldt :: Release Engineer, IBM Toronto Lab
Eclipse Modeling :: http://www.eclipse.or
g/modeling
http://w
iki.eclipse.org/index.php/User:Nickb
_______________________________________________
pdt-dev mailing list
pdt-dev eclipse.org
http
s://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/pdt-dev
|