On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 01:11:03PM -0800, Marvin Humphrey
wrote:
>
> On Feb 27, 2007, at 12:32 PM, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>
> > But I'm aware from a friend that at financial
> >institutions, the financial risk or losses from not
having some
> >software
> >running (in his area because it's not yet written)
can be around
> >$1,000,000
> >per day. The stakes are high.
>
> That's why Yahoo employs Rasmus Lerdorf (of PHP fame).
>
> I talked with Lerdorf at last year's OSCON, and he said
that Yahoo
> aggressively seeks to hire the developers of key open
software
> tools. According to him, if you want to sell Yahoo
software services
> and you have an open source competitor, you're screwed
-- because
> they'd much rather go with the open source solution and
hire the
> principle devs.
>
> Maybe y'all ought to break Perl once. Then all of a
sudden, some
Yes, it does work too damn well. I suspect that's part of
the "problem"
as to why no-one's volunteering to fix it.
> company will lose a million bucks and realize how
insane it is that
> they didn't keep a core Perl programmer on staff as an
insurance policy.
eg Yahoo!
What's curious here is that Yahoo! use Perl a lot in the
backend.
Yet I'm unaware of anyone on this list who works for them. I
know a couple
of ex-Yahoo! people in bond who visible CPAN authors (and
one now has had
a module assimilated into core)
Nicholas Clark
|