Steve Hay wrote:
> The problem here (sadly not shown up in the Compiler
messages section)
> is this:
>
> Error: 'Thread' not in typemap in Thread.xs, line 74
> Error: 'Thread' not in typemap in Thread.xs, line 84
> Error: 'Thread' not in typemap in Thread.xs, line 89
> Error: 'Thread' not in typemap in Thread.xs, line 90
> Error: 'Thread' not in typemap in Thread.xs, line 96
> Error: 'Thread' not in typemap in Thread.xs, line 101
> Error: 'Thread' not in typemap in Thread.xs, line 115
>
> which I guess is caused by change #31088:
>
> Change 31088 by rgs benny on 2007/04/26
13:58:34
>
> Remove the Thread typemap
>
> Why was that done?
Rafael Garcia-Suarez wrote:
> As a complement to :
>
> Change 31078 on 2007/04/25 by rgs stcosmo
>
> Subject: [PATCH] Thread.xs doesn't need magic
sig anymore
> From: "Jerry D. Hedden"
<jdhedden cpan.org>
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 13:25:20 -0400
> Message-ID:
> <1ff86f510704231025y22d30ecfk1ebc418f2b3a0bf7 mail.gmail.com>
>
> I can revert those two patches.
> However, I'm not sure why Thread is needed on Win32, or
whether
> ext/Thread should be completely removed. If someone as
some time to
> look into this... (Jerry, for example?)
AFAIK, with the removal of use5005threads, ext/Thread is
now
totally defunct and should be removed. MSWin32 doesn't
need
it because it does threads in a totally different way. (I
could be wrong, of course, and Jan can correct me.)
I'll look at removing the last remnants of ext/Thread to
clean up this mess.
|