Re: cygwin path conversions, take 4

On 10/07/2007, Jan Dubois <jandactivestate.com> wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't catch this earlier. It looks like
Cygwin::is_textmount()
> always returns the opposite of Cygwin::is_binmount().
Unless it is
> conceivable that there may eventually be a third mount
type, and both
> is_textmount() and is_binmount() would return FALSE for
it, I think
> having both functions is bloat and only one of them is
needed.
>
> It looks like these functions were just introduced with
this patch, so I
> would recommend to consider removing one again before
5.10 is released.

Agreed; I removed is_textmount() as 31773. (But that's not
tested)