Re: each @array

On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:36:44PM -0700, Artur Bergman
wrote:
> 
> Because we are quite happy with 5.8. It fixed the
serious problems  
> with 5.6, 5.6 added significant functionality. There is
nothing  
> really in 5.10 that I am hungry for.


Funny how different people have different perspectives. I
seldomly
use something that's available in 5.8 that wasn't already
present
in 5.6. In fact, I would have to dive into the manual to
find out
what's new in 5.8.

As for 5.10, things I'm looking forward to (in no particular
order):
my $_, state, give/when/~~, //, stacked file tests,
fieldhashes,
and a dozen exciting new regexp features.



Abigail

On Sep 10, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Abigail wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 10, 2007 at 12:36:44PM -0700, Artur Bergman
wrote:
>>
>> Because we are quite happy with 5.8. It fixed the
serious problems
>> with 5.6, 5.6 added significant functionality.
There is nothing
>> really in 5.10 that I am hungry for.
>
>
> Funny how different people have different perspectives.
I seldomly
> use something that's available in 5.8 that wasn't
already present
> in 5.6. In fact, I would have to dive into the manual
to find out
> what's new in 5.8.

I guessed the serious problems were ithreads and unicode,
but there  
was a demand from unicode users, win32 users and embedders.

I seldom use neither.

Artur