Re: document limitation of exec() inside pseudo-processes

On 13/09/2007, Jan Dubois <jandactivestate.com> wrote:
> Under fork() emulation exec() will not prevent the
execution of
> DESTROY methods and END blocks.  This happens because
we need to
> tear down the interpreter in the "forked"
thread.  I'm not sure
> if we could remove this limitation without leaking
resources,
> so I decided to just document it for now.

Thanks, applied as #31881.