Re: overload "0+" doesn't handle integer results

On 08/10/2007, Rick Delaney <rickbort.ca> wrote:
> Undoubtedly.  In the meantime here is another patch to
fix a segfault
> introduced by the first.

Thanks, applied.

On 08/10/2007, Rafael Garcia-Suarez <rgarciasuarezgmail.com> wrote:
> On 08/10/2007, Rick Delaney <rickbort.ca> wrote:
> > Undoubtedly.  In the meantime here is another
patch to fix a segfault
> > introduced by the first.
>
> Thanks, applied.

>From the smoke tests, it seems that test 531 fails for
builds with
-Duse64bitall. I can't test with this configuration.