Re: (Documentation?) Bug with 'last'

Steven Schubiger wrote:
>> The documentation suggests that a thing like the
above is not possible or
>> forbidden or breaks out of the if-block, but it
does not give a hint to
>> the current behaviour.
> 
> I don't think behaviors which shouldn't be used (and
could be subject to change)
> should be documented at all.

FWIW, Test::More exploits this behavior for skip() but I'll
be the first to
wave goodbye should this "feature" go away.


-- 
THIS I COMMAND!