RE: Pentax K 28mm f2.0 Lens

If you dont have any tolerance for my posts
then keep me on your kilefile like you promised.
People like you are what is giving me
the "celebrity" status ( just like OJ ). You
tell me I ignore facts, (I DON'T) but when I post
them repeatedly that disprove or put others opinions
in doubt, some people just cant handle that, including you.


YOU are giving me shit about asking if someone is crazy?
Asking if somebody is crazy is nowhere near the
same as a rude pornographic personal attacks
to which you were the worst and repeated offender ( 
Remember, you used the repeated stupid "fuckface"
term
everytime things didnt go your way...& You
resorted to that crude stupidity about a dozen times or
more).

So to all of this I say, Get lost, you Major League
Hypocrite.


jco


-----Original Message-----
From: pdml-bouncespdml.net [mailto:pdml-bouncespdml.net]
On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 1:43 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax K 28mm f2.0 Lens



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Pentax K 28mm f2.0 Lens


> No way Jose. I know that I did not engage in
> any name calling to start this latest barrage
> if vulgarities. I said someone was confusing
> autoaperture with autoexposure based on thier
> post, and THEY couldnt handle it and "lost
it".

At this point, no one has patience with you anymore,
everyone knows
exactly 
where a thread you get involved in is going to go, and no
one is
tolerating 
you any more.

You have been a pox on this list for almost as long as I
have been
reading 
it.
>
> I am like a harrassed celebrity you mentioned
> earlier, anytime somebody does not like what
> I have posted, they think is OK to just ignore
> the issues of the my posts and switch to a
> barrage of crude personal insults just because I
> am the "JCO" guy on the list. I wont stand
for it
> and never will.

Now you liken yourself to a celebrity?
Kind of like how Anna Nicole Smith was a celebrity?
I remember Mafud likening himself to Hemingway one time.
Like anyone believed that too.
You are also the guy who ignores facts put forward by other
people, you
are 
the person who deliberately and willfully misinterprests
what people
say, 
you are the person who doesn't bother to check URLs when
presented to
you. I note you just called Paul Stenquist
"crazy", intimating that he
is somehow 
stupid.

John, you don't get it, and you willfully want to stay
ignorant. God
bless you, and go away, I'm out of patience with you as
well.

William Robb 


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDMLpdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDMLpdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

From: merlynstonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz)
> >>>>> "Jenda" == Jenda
Krynicky <JendaKrynicky.cz> writes:
> 
> Jenda> Which module to use depends on the preference
of the developer
> and the Jenda> task at hand ... what library is it
based on is IMHO a
> secondary Jenda> concern.
> 
> Yeah, I guess, if you don't care about anything like
speed, quality of
> unicode support, or what binary libraries you have
installed (or can
> install) on your system.  Yeah, those are all very
unimportant things.
> 
> 
> [end sarcasm]
> 
> To me, those are the most important, since the
libraries that sit on
> top of them all provide all of the basic functionality.
 These days,
> anything that uses XML::LibXML gets my preference over
anything else,
> just because of the speed and space issues.

Most of the modules, with very different interfaces, are
based on 
either libxml or expat. I bet you can bang me over my head
about 
something that libxml does and expat doesn't, but the speed
doesn't 
seem to be the thing. And what style of parser do you use
matters 
much more as the XML grows. And I doubt it's any easier to
install 
libxml than expat (or vise versa). Sure, if you only have
and only 
can have one, then you do not get to choose.

Sorry, but your original response still looks to me like
talking 
about engines when someone asks about cars. Yeah, engines
are 
important, but I don't think that was the question.


BTW, from XML::LibXML::SAX docs:

NOTE: At the moment XML::LibXML provides only an incomplete
interface 
to libxml2's native SAX implementaion. The current
implementation is 
not tested in production environment. It may causes
significant 
memory problems or shows wrong behaviour. If you run into
specific 
problems using this part of XML::LibXML, let me know.


I don't know about you, but I'm a little worried.

Jenda
===== JendaKrynicky.cz === http://Jenda.Krynicky.cz
=====
When it comes to wine, women and song, wizards are allowed 
to get drunk and croon as much as they like.
	-- Terry Pratchett in Sourcery



Unsubscribing info is here: h
ttp://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/groups-32.html 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://g
roups.yahoo.com/group/perl-beginner/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http
://groups.yahoo.com/group/perl-beginner/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:perl-beginner-digest@yahoogroups.com 
    mailto:perl-beginner-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    perl-beginner-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.c
om/info/terms/