Hi Tom,
Thanks heaps for the advice
I will review and reorganize our ruleset.
Cheers,
Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Uffner [mailto:tom uffner.com]
Sent: Friday, 16 May 2008 1:16 p.m.
To: Mark Pagulayan
Cc: freebsd-pf freebsd.org
Subject: Re: FreeBSD PF 4.1 Inserts Flags S/SA Automatically
to rules
Mark Pagulayan wrote:
> Yes I am using net.link.bridge.pfil_member: 1. What is
the effect of
> this on the bridge interface.
see if_bridge(4) for full details. in short they control
whether or not
filtering is available on the member interfaces and/or the
bridge.
net.link.bridge.pfil_local_phys: 0
net.link.bridge.pfil_member: 1
net.link.bridge.pfil_bridge: 1
net.link.bridge.pfil_onlyip: 1
> No there is no such rules below in my ruleset
> # is there a "set skip on {lo0, bridge0}" in
here somewhere
>
> Is PF by default doing a filter on bridge0? What is the
effect of this
> rule on the bridge?
i realized too late that you don't need one. i expected to
see such a
rule due to my style of ruleset writing. i usually start w/
"block log
all"
to disable the default pass rule on all interfaces, then
explicitly
allow only the traffic i want.
you didn't, so the default for interfaces you don't have any
rules for
is pass all.
"set skip on X" has the same effect as a rule that
says "pass quick on
X"
_______________________________________________
freebsd-pf freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
"freebsd-pf-unsubscribe freebsd.org"
|