On Friday 05 October 2007, Theo Zweers wrote:
> 1.
> I wonder, can PGS have a 'memory' for already 'ignored' words?
> If you check spelling a document, and ending that session for what ever
>; reason. Then restart check spelling again, in maybe another document,
> PGS doesn't remember the words that are ignored in the last session.
> If you quit PGS, then this 'ignored words' memory can be flushed (or
> flushed with a button).
Although I understand the present implementation this would be a nice feature.
In particular there are times that I have to interrupt a spell check for
whatever reason and on restart go through all the ignored words again. This
*would* be somewhat alleviated by number two below, though.
> 2.
> And I believe somebody else asked this already: can PGS have to look in
> multiple dictionaries at the same time, which you can select?
> For instance: I have a Dutch text with lots of words that are for one
> purpose only (most English, some Dutch, words but they are specific for
> that purpose, so these words cannot be found in a normally English or
> Dutch dictionary).
> So one can open two (or more) dictionaries at the same time (I know
>; there are a Language.Spelling and a Language.UserSpelling dictionaries,
> but I want those to be specific for that language)? So the next one
> would be: Purpose.Spelling and maybe another Purpose.Spelling where the
> purpose have different names.
Hear, hear! For example, if I'm doing a technical document (or anything else
with a specialized vocabulary). I don't want to add the words to UserSpelling
because I would need them flagged as misspellings in other documents. This
would need a) multiple user dictionaries and b) ability to select multiple
dictionaries.
> Theo
>;
> (Nice work, Tim, those Halloween borders... - I'm sure you read this also)
Oooo you got me 
I'm glad you like the borders. Now I need to work on a
couple of scripts (and you know one of those... still working on the
astronomical algorithms...)
Tim Doty
.
