Direction of PEAR Auth

Mark Wiesemann wrote:

> Lukas, or anybody else with knowledge about PDO: Do you
have any
> comments on this? Would it make sense to have a PDO
driver? (We have
> currently DB and MDB2 drivers.)

I think it makes sense. We do have a PDO driver for LiveUser
for example.

regards,
Lukas

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Lukas Smith wrote:

> Mark Wiesemann wrote:
>
>> Lukas, or anybody else with knowledge about PDO: Do
you have any
>> comments on this? Would it make sense to have a PDO
driver? (We have
>> currently DB and MDB2 drivers.)
>
>
> I think it makes sense. We do have a PDO driver for
LiveUser for example.

At least not be dependent on some more package case the pdo
is there.
I mean that on the upper Auth level.
I don't mean DB is bad nore that DB does not need a pdo
layer.
Auth needs means but should restrict them to an absolute
minimum and 
also try to be as far as possible indepedent from the
requiring 
application level.

Sorry if that does not make sense, it does for me  so happy
to discuss it.
à+
-- 
toggg

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

>> Lukas, or anybody else with knowledge about PDO: Do
you have any
>> comments on this? Would it make sense to have a PDO
driver? (We have
>> currently DB and MDB2 drivers.)
> 
> 
> I think it makes sense. We do have a PDO driver for
LiveUser for example.

I think it makes sense as well, writing the first version of
the phdo 
driver for liveuser was fairly easy and performance will be
better than 
going though another layer.

Arnaud.

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php