The name was used since few monthes,
phases will perhaps come.
Case it is a real proposal, I don't see no reason to apply
different
rules because Mansion has some past here.
Should I mention he forgot to build an own QF list or forgot
to answer
on the general list ?
Can you explain we are overcrowd by those messages.
I did not say this package is senseless but that it never
allows to
overpass proposals rules.
I got insulted as I tried to arrange some uneasy situation.
I want to see code, now.
I really hate to see people profit on the comunity while
being absent.
--
toggg
P.S. I don't drink tea.
Please, don't send me a private message first, I got quite
in the trap
Pierre wrote:
>On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 00:31:23 +0100
>bertrand toggg.com (bertrand Gugger) wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>I feel really abused by the way you use pear.
>>Don't use it this way on your site, or put some
direct links on
>>sources in your proposal.
>>Or tell me pear belongs to you and I should just
shut up.
>>
>>For those interested, I still did not read any code
there as I prefer
>>to do it on some "official" way.
>>
>>
>
>Toggg, please take a big breath, a tea or something
else, but cool down.
>
>There is nothing wrong in this proposal. This package
started its life
>outside pear and Bertrand thinks now it is time to bring
it to pear.
>Whether your mail was a trigger does not matter, this
proposal is valid.
>
>You do not like it? Vote -1 in the vote phase.
>
>--Pierre
>
>
>
>
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|