+1 for Images::Puzzle

Mark Wiesemann (http://pear.php.ne
t/user/wiesemann) has voted +1 on the proposal for
Images::Puzzle.

Proposal information:
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=349
Vote information:
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.p
hp?id=349&handle=wiesemann

Comment:

Please change the version number before the first release,
0.0.1 is not
vaild in PEAR (0.1.0 would be correct).
(I just saw this in your .phps files, but did not check your
package.xml.)

-- 
Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Mark Wiesemann wrote:
> Please change the version number before the first
release, 0.0.1 is not
> vaild in PEAR (0.1.0 would be correct).
> (I just saw this in your .phps files, but did not check
your package.xml.)
> 

thanks for your vote.

this version number is temporary only - before package will
be accepted
by you. The first release will be 0.1.0. I reserved this
number in
package timeline specially for this moment 

-- 
best regards
Fela

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Mark Wiesemann wrote:

>Mark Wiesemann (http://pear.php.ne
t/user/wiesemann) has voted +1 on the proposal for
Images::Puzzle.
>
>Proposal information:
>http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=349
>Vote information:
>http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.p
hp?id=349&handle=wiesemann
>
>Comment:
>
>Please change the version number before the first
release, 0.0.1 is not
>vaild in PEAR (0.1.0 would be correct).
>(I just saw this in your .phps files, but did not check
your package.xml.)
>  
>
So, I made wrong releases number myself.
Where is it defined that 0.0.1 is not valid for an alpha ?
I can't find it in the guidelines.
Regards
-- 
toggg

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

bertrand Gugger wrote:

> So, I made wrong releases number myself.
> Where is it defined that 0.0.1 is not valid for an
alpha ?
> I can't find it in the guidelines.

http:/
/pear.php.net/group/docs/20040226-vn.php

Quote: "The version number must be greater or equal
than 0.1.0"

Regards,
Mark

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Mark Wiesemann wrote:

> bertrand Gugger wrote:
>
>> So, I made wrong releases number myself.
>> Where is it defined that 0.0.1 is not valid for an
alpha ?
>> I can't find it in the guidelines.
>
>
> http:/
/pear.php.net/group/docs/20040226-vn.php
>
> Quote: "The version number must be greater or
equal than 0.1.0"
>
> Regards,
> Mark
>
Ah ... thanks, I did not think of looking in "The PEAR
Group".

However, if you look in the accepted RFC 
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=65
0.0.x is possible for packages in proposal stage.

It's usefull, as it allows proposers to have their own,
pre-acceptation, 
release cycle.

Should not this Pear Group rule be actualized ?

It would also be nice to update the manual guidelines , at
least to 
refer to these fundaments.

Regards
-- 
toggg

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php