Re: hosting packages on external VCS sites

On 3/18/07, Gregory Beaver <gregchiaraquartet.net>
wrote:
> What do you think?

I am ok with forcing the documentation to reside on
pear.php.net.

But I am not ok with forcing the developer to use a specific
SCM
environment. The source code itself is already available on
p.p.n via
the release files. So it is no problem for a new maintainer
to take
over a project.

IMHO a maintainer should be free to choose the SCM tools he
wants. If
he provides links to them they could easily be checked
automatically
and removed or disabled.

-- 
  mit freundlichen Grüßen
  Markus Tacker

  kontaktdaten ~ http://m.tacker.org/kont
akt/

On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 02:02:47PM +0100, Markus Tacker
wrote:

> On 3/18/07, Gregory Beaver <gregchiaraquartet.net> wrote:
> >What do you think?
> 
> I am ok with forcing the documentation to reside on
pear.php.net.
 
I think that is a nice goal, but it implies that all
documentation
must be written in Docbook (currently).  Until there is a
way for
pear.php.net to host arbitrary documentation (well, within
reasonable
limits), I wouldn't feel comfortable with making this a
requirement.

-- 
Jon Parise (jon of php.net) :: The PHP Project (http://www.php.net/)

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php