Brett Bieber wrote:
> Are you using PEAR_PFM2 to generate the package.xml
files?
> If so, can't you specify the package.xml output
directory in your PFM
> script...? 'outputdirectory'
Yes PEAR_PackageFileManager2. That's my point! I *am*
using the option
'outputdirectory' and PEAR puts the XML file in that
directory fine but
it's giving the error I referred to when you run "pear
package" on the
XML file.
> Or is it that you want to keep the package.xml files in
your build
> directory?
This is exactly what I'm doing. This is a fairly large
project so I'd
like to keep all the PEAR build stuff in a common
place...this includes
most of the buildpackage.php files I have, various PHP
scripts to auto
discover buildpackage.php files for plugins, package XML
files, etc.
> The package.xml must be in the root of
> the app which it is packaging because it is the package
manifest for
> all the files the package contains. Any directory
references within
> the package.xml file must be relative to the
package.xml as if it is
> the root, otherwise the installer would have no idea
where to get the
> files.
This is the part I think is a bug. If I give packagedir and
outputdirectory and those aren't the same the "pear
package" command
should use the value for packagedir, not the dirname() of
the package
XML file.
> Maybe as a workaround, temporarily copy the package.xml
file to the
> correct directory, chdir, then pear package, and
removed the tmp
> package.xml copy.
That would work. If Greg (or whoever) doesn't think this is
a bug or
that accommodating this sort of scenario is necessary that
is what I
will probably have to do.
> This concept could be used for a modified/improved
'pear package'
> command which has a new parameter like pear package -s
/path/to/app
> /path/to/app/build/package.xml which would copy the
package.xml file
> as well as the files referenced in the package.xml
using -s as the
> root to a temp directory containing the correct file
structure, where
> the package tar/tgz would be created then copied back
where the pear
> package call was issued from.
Right, there are probaby a few ways to get the desired
behavior. I'm
flexible, just want to know if this should be considered a
bug or not
and how best facilitate this sort of thing.
--Tony
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|