On 3/29/07, Chuck Hagenbuch <chuck horde.org> wrote:
> Quoting Greg Beaver <gregchiaraquartet.net>:
>
> >> My suggestion is to give a developer some
limited time for pulling the
> >> release (like a week, two weeks at most) since
the problems warranting
> >> said pull are usually quite obvious. And let's
remove that "Delete"
> >> button except for the packages that don't yet
have any releases. Our
> >> main goal is to ensure that whatever was
released via PEAR stays there.
> >>
> >> Of course deleting the packages will still be
possible with the help of
> >> the admin, but I hope our admins learned that
lesson already. 
> >>
> >> So what I propose is writing guidelines for
deleting packages / releases
> >> and making changes to pearweb to enforce
these.
> >
> > These are *excellent* suggestions. Would you mind
writing up a draft
> > for guidelines? I would like to see this
implemented very soon.
>
> That all sounds reasonable to me.
>
> > In this case, Christian Weiske is the horse in
your proverbial analogy
> > , as he is
both the QA engineer and the person wishing to restart
> > development.
>
Don't worry christian I'll help you qa if you want
> [deletia]
>
> > Are we cool? Do the Horde folks and everyone feel
their needs are
> > addressed?
>
> So the specific orphaned package(s) in question will be
imported, but
> otherwise the changes that will be implemented are the
ones about
> pulling releases described above? Sounds good to me.
>
> Best,
> -chuck
>
> --
> "we are plastered to the windshield of the bus
that is time." - Chris
>
> --
> PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
> To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
>
>
--
David Coallier,
Founder & Software Architect,
Agora Production (http://agoraproduction.com
)
51.42.06.70.18
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|