The RPCBlogging package

On 3/19/06, Anant Narayanan <anantkix.in> wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> > It could be optionally dependant on both of them.
It would make more
> > sense to have a Blogging package IMHO which just
connects in different
> > ways.
>
> I agree. A single blogging package that could talk to
any kind of
> blogging server is what we need. Here's what I
propose:
>
> 1) First create an XML_Atom package, since there is no
implementation of
> the Atom API in PEAR currently. Like XML_RPC, this
package will have
> more wider applications than just blogging.
>
> 2) Then make XML_RPC and XML_Atom optional dependencies
for Services_Blog.
>
> 3) Two sets of drivers for Services_Blog, the first set
uses RPC, and
> the second uses Atom.
>
> I'd also like to know if anyone is working / had
worked on implementing
> the Atom API as a package in PEAR.
>

There were some feed reader and writer packages...I don't
recall if
they are in yet or not. Check the proposal list.

--
Justin Patrin

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php