List Info

Thread: Re: +1 for Math::Math_Combinatorics




Re: +1 for Math::Math_Combinatorics
user name
2007-05-11 14:40:29
Hi David


--- David Sanders <dsandersbaselinesolutions.com.au> wrote:

> 
> > It would be cool to have also a separate method to
calculate the number of
> > elements resulting of a given combinatoric, with
no need to generate the
> > whole set of elements.
> 
> Yes, I've thought of this possibility.  Thanks for your
input 

This will be extremelly useful, and the factorial rules are
not that
problematic. Only thing is that if you are going to deal
with big numbers, then
you might want to look at bcmath and/or gmp, which is what I
use for
Math_Integer and Math_Fibonacci.

Will look at your code over the weekend.

Cheers.

--
Jesus M. Castagnetto (jcastagnettoyahoo.com)
Web site: http://www.castagnetto.or
g/
Research: http://metallo.scripps.ed
u/
PEAR stuff: http://pear.ph
p.net/user/jmcastagnetto


 
____________________________________________________________
________________________
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. 
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/feat
ures_spam.html

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php


[1]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )