List Info

Thread: cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php Test-JSON.php




cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php Test-JSON.php
user name
2006-03-24 15:40:10
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 05:57:44AM -0000, Michal Migurski
wrote:
> migurski		Fri Mar 24 05:57:44 2006 UTC
> 
>   Added files:                 
>     /pear/Services_JSON	JSON.php Test-JSON.php 

Cool.  Glad to see this getting into CVS!

Three of the votes for this package expressed reservations
with putting 
this package being in the Services category:

http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=wenz
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-sho
w.php?id=198&handle=justinpatrin
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=bolk

I share those reservations.  Perhaps put it in the Text or
HTML 
categories?  Please, a consensus on where to put this should
be reached 
before the first release.

Thanks,

--Dan

-- 
 T H E   A N A L Y S I S   A N D   S O L U T I O N S   C O M
P A N Y
            data intensive web and database programming
                http://www.Analy
sisAndSolutions.com/
 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232  v: 718-854-0335 f:
718-854-0409

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php Test-JSON.php
user name
2006-03-24 16:50:49
Bonjour,
Daniel Convissor wrote:

>On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 05:57:44AM -0000, Michal
Migurski wrote:
>  
>
>>migurski		Fri Mar 24 05:57:44 2006 UTC
>>
>>  Added files:                 
>>    /pear/Services_JSON	JSON.php Test-JSON.php 
>>    
>>
>
>Cool.  Glad to see this getting into CVS!
>
>Three of the votes for this package expressed
reservations with putting 
>this package being in the Services category:
>
>http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=wenz
>http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-sho
w.php?id=198&handle=justinpatrin
>http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=bolk
>
>I share those reservations.  Perhaps put it in the Text
or HTML 
>categories?  Please, a consensus on where to put this
should be reached 
>before the first release.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--Dan
>
>  
>
I was also happy to see this commit.
Congrats Michal !

As for other classes,
I really like to see client executable code included.

For the category,
if javascript belongs to html , then HTML category.
That should be, as javascript belongs to public.
Just not the server of it.

I would add a call for a new role by pear installer , client
script , as 
javascript

Should be in some public area.

Regards
-- 
toggg

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php Test-JSON.php
user name
2006-03-24 17:58:27
>> Cool.  Glad to see this getting into CVS!

Same here. =)

>> Three of the votes for this package expressed
reservations with  
>> putting this package being in the Services
category:
>>
>> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=wenz
>> http://p
ear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php? 
>> id=198&handle=justinpatrin
>> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=bolk
>>
>> I share those reservations.  Perhaps put it in the
Text or HTML  
>> categories?  Please, a consensus on where to put
this should be  
>> reached before the first release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Dan
>>
>>
> I was also happy to see this commit.
> Congrats Michal !
>
> As for other classes,
> I really like to see client executable code included.
>
> For the category,
> if javascript belongs to html , then HTML category.
> That should be, as javascript belongs to public.
> Just not the server of it.
>
> I would add a call for a new role by pear installer ,
client  
> script , as javascript
>
> Should be in some public area.

I feel the same way - I think all that's needed is a change
in  
permissions for my CVS directory access, right? Text_JSON
makes some  
sense... All the XML stuff has its own top-level category,
and I feel  
that JSON is approx. on the same level as XML though
obviously not as  
wide-spread. Would it be presumptuous to start a JSON or
Javascript  
category, that might house an RPC lib and other toys in the
future?

-mike.

------------------------------------------------------------
----
michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
sf/ca            http://mike.teczn
o.com/contact.html

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php Test-JSON.php
user name
2006-03-24 18:14:34
On 3/24/06, Michal Migurski <miketeczno.com> wrote:
> > > Cool.  Glad to see this getting into CVS!
>
> Same here. =)
>
> > > Three of the votes for this package expressed
reservations with
> > > putting this package being in the Services
category:
> > >
> > > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=wenz
> > > http://p
ear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?
> > > id=198&handle=justinpatrin
> > > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=bolk
> > >
> > > I share those reservations.  Perhaps put it
in the Text or HTML
> > > categories?  Please, a consensus on where to
put this should be
> > > reached before the first release.
> > >
> > >
> > I was also happy to see this commit.
> > Congrats Michal !
> >
> > As for other classes,
> > I really like to see client executable code
included.
> >
> > For the category,
> > if javascript belongs to html , then HTML
category.
> > That should be, as javascript belongs to public.
> > Just not the server of it.
> >
> > I would add a call for a new role by pear
installer , client
> > script , as javascript
> >
> > Should be in some public area.
>
> I feel the same way - I think all that's needed is a
change in
> permissions for my CVS directory access, right?
Text_JSON makes some
> sense... All the XML stuff has its own top-level
category, and I feel
> that JSON is approx. on the same level as XML though
obviously not as
> wide-spread. Would it be presumptuous to start a JSON
or Javascript
> category, that might house an RPC lib and other toys in
the future?

One comment I'd have, should this be the route taken (and I
think this
is totally appropriate; JSON is a markup just as XML is), is
to separate
the current JSON code into its functional elements:

    Json/Encoder.php
    Json/Decoder.php

and then you'd have:

    Json/Rpc.php

for that fun json-rpc stuff later... 

--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
mweierophinneygmail.com
http://weierophinne
y.net/matthew/

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Call for Votes: JSON location
user name
2006-04-07 21:19:17
Folks:

The JSON class has been waiting some time for a decision on
which category 
is best.  So, let's do a quick vote, please.  I'll tally
them up on 
Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time.  Here are the
options:

Services/JSON
HTML/JSON
Text/JSON
JSON/JSON
JSON/Encode|Decode|RPC

That last option would have separate classes/files for each
operation.

Thanks,

--Dan

-- 
 T H E   A N A L Y S I S   A N D   S O L U T I O N S   C O M
P A N Y
            data intensive web and database programming
                http://www.Analy
sisAndSolutions.com/
 4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232  v: 718-854-0335 f:
718-854-0409

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Call for Votes: JSON location
user name
2006-04-07 21:48:14
Daniel Convissor wrote:

>Folks:
>
>The JSON class has been waiting some time for a decision
on which category 
>is best.  So, let's do a quick vote, please.
>
Why should we vote ?

>  I'll tally them up on 
>Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time.  Here are the
options:
>
>Services/JSON
>HTML/JSON
>  
>
+1
as JSON is "JavaScript Object Notation" so quite
definitively attached 
to HTML.

>Text/JSON
>JSON/JSON
>JSON/Encode|Decode|RPC
>
>That last option would have separate classes/files for
each operation.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--Dan
>
>  
>
-- 
toggg

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Call for Votes: JSON location
user name
2006-04-07 21:57:43
On 4/7/06, Daniel Convissor <danielcanalysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> The JSON class has been waiting some time for a
decision on which category
> is best.  So, let's do a quick vote, please.  I'll
tally them up on
> Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time.  Here are the
options:
>
> Services/JSON
> HTML/JSON
> Text/JSON
> JSON/JSON
> JSON/Encode|Decode|RPC
>
> That last option would have separate classes/files for
each operation.

What's about a one to one mapping to pecl/json? It will
allow a smooth
migration from php4 to the php 5 versions which will include
it. It is
not OO but who needs a OO interface for such interface?

--Pierre

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Call for Votes: JSON location
user name
2006-04-07 21:55:50
Daniel Convissor wrote:

>Folks:
>
>The JSON class has been waiting some time for a decision
on which category 
>is best.  So, let's do a quick vote, please.  I'll
tally them up on 
>Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time.  Here are the
options:
>
>Services/JSON
>HTML/JSON
>Text/JSON
>JSON/JSON
>JSON/Encode|Decode|RPC
>
>That last option would have separate classes/files for
each operation.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--Dan
>
>  
>
Forgot to propose :
FSM/JSON

Regards
-- 
toggg

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Call for Votes: JSON location
user name
2006-04-07 22:13:56
Pierre wrote:
> On 4/7/06, Daniel Convissor <danielcanalysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
>   
>> Folks:
>>
>> The JSON class has been waiting some time for a
decision on which category
>> is best.  So, let's do a quick vote, please. 
I'll tally them up on
>> Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time.  Here are
the options:
>>
>> Services/JSON
>> HTML/JSON
>> Text/JSON
>> JSON/JSON
>> JSON/Encode|Decode|RPC
>>
>> That last option would have separate classes/files
for each operation.
>>     
>
> What's about a one to one mapping to pecl/json? It
will allow a smooth
> migration from php4 to the php 5 versions which will
include it. It is
> not OO but who needs a OO interface for such interface?
>
> --Pierre
>
>   
Unless they are making major changes before bundling, the
current JSON 
extension is just 2 functions
json_encode and json_decode

-josh

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Call for Votes: JSON location
user name
2006-04-07 22:23:39
On 4/7/06, Daniel Convissor <danielcanalysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> The JSON class has been waiting some time for a
decision on which category
> is best.  So, let's do a quick vote, please.  I'll
tally them up on
> Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time.  Here are the
options:
>
> Text/JSON

+1

--
Justin Patrin

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

[1-10] [11-20] [21-30] [31]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )