|
List Info
Thread: cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php Test-JSON.php
|
|
| cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php
Test-JSON.php |

|
2006-03-24 15:40:10 |
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 05:57:44AM -0000, Michal Migurski
wrote:
> migurski Fri Mar 24 05:57:44 2006 UTC
>
> Added files:
> /pear/Services_JSON JSON.php Test-JSON.php
Cool. Glad to see this getting into CVS!
Three of the votes for this package expressed reservations
with putting
this package being in the Services category:
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=wenz
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-sho
w.php?id=198&handle=justinpatrin
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=bolk
I share those reservations. Perhaps put it in the Text or
HTML
categories? Please, a consensus on where to put this should
be reached
before the first release.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M
P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.Analy
sisAndSolutions.com/
4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f:
718-854-0409
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|
|
| cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php
Test-JSON.php |

|
2006-03-24 16:50:49 |
Bonjour,
Daniel Convissor wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 05:57:44AM -0000, Michal
Migurski wrote:
>
>
>>migurski Fri Mar 24 05:57:44 2006 UTC
>>
>> Added files:
>> /pear/Services_JSON JSON.php Test-JSON.php
>>
>>
>
>Cool. Glad to see this getting into CVS!
>
>Three of the votes for this package expressed
reservations with putting
>this package being in the Services category:
>
>http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=wenz
>http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-sho
w.php?id=198&handle=justinpatrin
>http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=bolk
>
>I share those reservations. Perhaps put it in the Text
or HTML
>categories? Please, a consensus on where to put this
should be reached
>before the first release.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--Dan
>
>
>
I was also happy to see this commit.
Congrats Michal !
As for other classes,
I really like to see client executable code included.
For the category,
if javascript belongs to html , then HTML category.
That should be, as javascript belongs to public.
Just not the server of it.
I would add a call for a new role by pear installer , client
script , as
javascript
Should be in some public area.
Regards
--
toggg
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|
|
| cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php
Test-JSON.php |

|
2006-03-24 17:58:27 |
>> Cool. Glad to see this getting into CVS!
Same here. =)
>> Three of the votes for this package expressed
reservations with
>> putting this package being in the Services
category:
>>
>> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=wenz
>> http://p
ear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?
>> id=198&handle=justinpatrin
>> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=bolk
>>
>> I share those reservations. Perhaps put it in the
Text or HTML
>> categories? Please, a consensus on where to put
this should be
>> reached before the first release.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> --Dan
>>
>>
> I was also happy to see this commit.
> Congrats Michal !
>
> As for other classes,
> I really like to see client executable code included.
>
> For the category,
> if javascript belongs to html , then HTML category.
> That should be, as javascript belongs to public.
> Just not the server of it.
>
> I would add a call for a new role by pear installer ,
client
> script , as javascript
>
> Should be in some public area.
I feel the same way - I think all that's needed is a change
in
permissions for my CVS directory access, right? Text_JSON
makes some
sense... All the XML stuff has its own top-level category,
and I feel
that JSON is approx. on the same level as XML though
obviously not as
wide-spread. Would it be presumptuous to start a JSON or
Javascript
category, that might house an RPC lib and other toys in the
future?
-mike.
------------------------------------------------------------
----
michal migurski- contact info and pgp key:
sf/ca http://mike.teczn
o.com/contact.html
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|
|
| cvs: pear /Services_JSON JSON.php
Test-JSON.php |

|
2006-03-24 18:14:34 |
On 3/24/06, Michal Migurski <mike teczno.com> wrote:
> > > Cool. Glad to see this getting into CVS!
>
> Same here. =)
>
> > > Three of the votes for this package expressed
reservations with
> > > putting this package being in the Services
category:
> > >
> > > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=wenz
> > > http://p
ear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?
> > > id=198&handle=justinpatrin
> > > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-vote-show.php?id
=198&handle=bolk
> > >
> > > I share those reservations. Perhaps put it
in the Text or HTML
> > > categories? Please, a consensus on where to
put this should be
> > > reached before the first release.
> > >
> > >
> > I was also happy to see this commit.
> > Congrats Michal !
> >
> > As for other classes,
> > I really like to see client executable code
included.
> >
> > For the category,
> > if javascript belongs to html , then HTML
category.
> > That should be, as javascript belongs to public.
> > Just not the server of it.
> >
> > I would add a call for a new role by pear
installer , client
> > script , as javascript
> >
> > Should be in some public area.
>
> I feel the same way - I think all that's needed is a
change in
> permissions for my CVS directory access, right?
Text_JSON makes some
> sense... All the XML stuff has its own top-level
category, and I feel
> that JSON is approx. on the same level as XML though
obviously not as
> wide-spread. Would it be presumptuous to start a JSON
or Javascript
> category, that might house an RPC lib and other toys in
the future?
One comment I'd have, should this be the route taken (and I
think this
is totally appropriate; JSON is a markup just as XML is), is
to separate
the current JSON code into its functional elements:
Json/Encoder.php
Json/Decoder.php
and then you'd have:
Json/Rpc.php
for that fun json-rpc stuff later...
--
Matthew Weier O'Phinney
mweierophinney gmail.com
http://weierophinne
y.net/matthew/
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|
|
| Call for Votes: JSON location |

|
2006-04-07 21:19:17 |
Folks:
The JSON class has been waiting some time for a decision on
which category
is best. So, let's do a quick vote, please. I'll tally
them up on
Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time. Here are the
options:
Services/JSON
HTML/JSON
Text/JSON
JSON/JSON
JSON/Encode|Decode|RPC
That last option would have separate classes/files for each
operation.
Thanks,
--Dan
--
T H E A N A L Y S I S A N D S O L U T I O N S C O M
P A N Y
data intensive web and database programming
http://www.Analy
sisAndSolutions.com/
4015 7th Ave #4, Brooklyn NY 11232 v: 718-854-0335 f:
718-854-0409
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|
|
| Call for Votes: JSON location |

|
2006-04-07 21:48:14 |
Daniel Convissor wrote:
>Folks:
>
>The JSON class has been waiting some time for a decision
on which category
>is best. So, let's do a quick vote, please.
>
Why should we vote ?
> I'll tally them up on
>Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time. Here are the
options:
>
>Services/JSON
>HTML/JSON
>
>
+1
as JSON is "JavaScript Object Notation" so quite
definitively attached
to HTML.
>Text/JSON
>JSON/JSON
>JSON/Encode|Decode|RPC
>
>That last option would have separate classes/files for
each operation.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--Dan
>
>
>
--
toggg
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|
|
| Call for Votes: JSON location |

|
2006-04-07 21:57:43 |
On 4/7/06, Daniel Convissor <danielc analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> The JSON class has been waiting some time for a
decision on which category
> is best. So, let's do a quick vote, please. I'll
tally them up on
> Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time. Here are the
options:
>
> Services/JSON
> HTML/JSON
> Text/JSON
> JSON/JSON
> JSON/Encode|Decode|RPC
>
> That last option would have separate classes/files for
each operation.
What's about a one to one mapping to pecl/json? It will
allow a smooth
migration from php4 to the php 5 versions which will include
it. It is
not OO but who needs a OO interface for such interface?
--Pierre
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|
|
| Call for Votes: JSON location |

|
2006-04-07 21:55:50 |
Daniel Convissor wrote:
>Folks:
>
>The JSON class has been waiting some time for a decision
on which category
>is best. So, let's do a quick vote, please. I'll
tally them up on
>Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time. Here are the
options:
>
>Services/JSON
>HTML/JSON
>Text/JSON
>JSON/JSON
>JSON/Encode|Decode|RPC
>
>That last option would have separate classes/files for
each operation.
>
>Thanks,
>
>--Dan
>
>
>
Forgot to propose :
FSM/JSON
Regards
--
toggg
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|
|
| Call for Votes: JSON location |

|
2006-04-07 22:13:56 |
Pierre wrote:
> On 4/7/06, Daniel Convissor <danielc analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
>
>> Folks:
>>
>> The JSON class has been waiting some time for a
decision on which category
>> is best. So, let's do a quick vote, please.
I'll tally them up on
>> Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time. Here are
the options:
>>
>> Services/JSON
>> HTML/JSON
>> Text/JSON
>> JSON/JSON
>> JSON/Encode|Decode|RPC
>>
>> That last option would have separate classes/files
for each operation.
>>
>
> What's about a one to one mapping to pecl/json? It
will allow a smooth
> migration from php4 to the php 5 versions which will
include it. It is
> not OO but who needs a OO interface for such interface?
>
> --Pierre
>
>
Unless they are making major changes before bundling, the
current JSON
extension is just 2 functions
json_encode and json_decode
-josh
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|
|
| Call for Votes: JSON location |

|
2006-04-07 22:23:39 |
On 4/7/06, Daniel Convissor <danielc analysisandsolutions.com> wrote:
> Folks:
>
> The JSON class has been waiting some time for a
decision on which category
> is best. So, let's do a quick vote, please. I'll
tally them up on
> Tuesday afternoon, America/New York time. Here are the
options:
>
> Text/JSON
+1
--
Justin Patrin
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|
|
|
|