Re: The database package that time forgot: DB

Adam Harvey wrote:
> Quoting Joe Stump <joejoestump.net>:
>>> Actually I think we need to have a successor
available by that time 
>>>  that is based on PDO.
>>
>> I've got a working concept of this.
> 
> Good to hear -- PDO was one of the reasons I was asking
the question. 
> Joe, I'd be quite happy to help out, although I
probably don't have much 
> spare time for it in the next couple of months.
> 
> Also, I don't mind shuffling the DB EOL date (should
there be a 
> consensus that DB can and should be EOLed) around a bit
to fit in with 
> the stabilisation of any new PEAR2 package. It might be
nice to be able 
> to say to users that they can go from a stable DB to a
stable PEAR2:B, 
> or whatever it ends up being called.
> 
> Adam
>

I'm sure there are quite a few people who would be willing
to hack a bit 
at this who've moved to pdo and aren't going back.

Do you have the code up somewhere?

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php