Re: +1 for HTML::HTML_QuickForm_Rule

Thread: Re: +1 for HTML::HTML_QuickForm_Rule_Spelling

Search this list only Search all lists
Re: +1 for HTML::HTML_QuickForm_Rule_Spelling
	2007-09-30 23:27:12
Christian Weiske wrote: > I don't like the spaghetti code in validate(), but this is a worthwhile extension to quickform. Do you mean the javascript part or the php part? I could split validate() up into smaller functions to make it more readable... -- David Sanders shangxiao -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub .php

Re: +1 for HTML::HTML_QuickForm_Rule_Spelling
	2007-09-30 23:34:22
David, > > I don't like the spaghetti code in validate(), but this is a > > worthwhile extension to quickform. > Do you mean the javascript part or the php part? I could split > validate() up into smaller functions to make it more readable... php. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards, Christian Weiske -- PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub .php

[1-2]