Hi Jesus,
> Jesus M. Castagnetto wrote:
>
> Hi Lukas
>
> (Sorry I could not answer your message before, I was
> preparing some classes and talks)
>
> --- Lukas Feiler <lukas empoweredmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > as Justin and Jesus suggested, I implemented
ISO/IEC
> 9075-14:2005 for
> > mapping SQL identifies to XML names within
XML_Query2XML (voting in
> > progress).
> >
> > I have 2 questions regarding the implementation:
> >
> > 1) What do you think about (not) making
> XML_Query2XML_ISO9075Mapper the
> > default?
> > ISO 9075-mapping is quite complex as it also
requires
> Unicode support.
> > Therefore my full implementation has 356 lines and
on a
> PIII, 2.2 GHz it
> > does only about 1755 mappings per second.
Considering this
> overhead, I'm not
> > sure if XML_Query2XML_ISO9075Mapper should be the
default
> mapper. I guess a
> > lot of people only use [a-Z_0-9]* for SQL
identifiers and
> don't need any
> > special mapping at all.
>
> Agree on this one. The extended mapping will be useful
in the cases of
> accessing some legacy or foreign language named
identifiers,
> thus it should not
> be the default but an option. I've dealt with some old
dbs
> that included spaces
> and other random stuff in the names, just because of
some
> internal standard
> that mandated a fixed number of chars, so the db admins
got
> inventive in their
> naming schemes
Not using ISO9075 mapping as the default also has the
advantage that the
dependency on I18N_UnicodeString is only optional.
Users that don't do ISO9075 mapping won't even have to
install
I18N_UnicodeString (which is currently only beta).
>
> > 2) Why do you think that Section 9.2 of ISO/IEC
> 9075-14:2005 is relevant?
> > XML_Query2XML only deals with column names but
never with
> multiple SQL
> > identifiers that would have to be mapped to a
single XML name.
>
> I would not implement that just yet. I am not sure what
could
> be the exact
> applicability of that in most day to day work. Seems to
me
> that the usual
> mapping of database names, tables and fields in a
hierachical
> manner in XML
> should suffice for most purposes, no need to have a
multipart
> fo!!.ba++r.bo1#ng
> mapping to a single element.
OK, I agree
>
> >
> > The source of ISO9075Mapper.php
> (XML_Query2XML_ISO9075Mapper) can be found
> > at:
> > http://query2xml.sourceforge.net/ISO9075Mapper.php.html
a>
> >
> > Unit tests can be found at:
> > http://query2xml.sourceforge.net/ISO9075MapperTest.ph
p.html
> >
> > Note: currently XML_Query2XML_ISO9075Mapper has
its own methods for
> > converting characters from UTF-8 to Unicode (and
vice
> versa); as suggested
> > by Justin, I placed a feature request for the PEAR
package
> > I18N_UnicodeString. This package actually contains
the required
> > functionality but does not currently provide it
via public
> static methods.
>
> I see that your request has been attended so you can
now use
> the methods in the
> aforementioned package instead of the internally
defined ones
> in your code.
>
> I am impressed with having implemented this, and that
you had
> the stamina to
> waddle through that standard (which is not light
reading at all).
>
> Cheers and keep the good work.
Thanks for making me implement ISO 9075 It's a
great feature!
As soon as the PEPr voting process is over I'll make a new
release that
includes all changes suggested during the voting process.
I already implemented and documented everything but I'd
like to wait if
anything else turns up until tomorrow 08:00 UTC.
I just updated http://query2xml.sourceforge.net/ISO9075Mapper.php.html
a> so
you can have a look at the new implementation using
I18N_UnicodeString.
Lukas
--
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php
|