List Info

Thread: Comment on Authentication::Auth_TypeKey




Comment on Authentication::Auth_TypeKey
user name
2006-05-30 00:44:28
Adam Ashley (http://pear.php.net/
user/aashley) has commented on the proposal for
Authentication::Auth_TypeKey.

Comment:

I have to disagree with Martin and Lukas, this package
should be created
seperate then wrappers created for Auth and/or LiveUser.
Same as we do
with Net_POP3.

Proposal information:
http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=164

-- 
Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at http://pear.php.net

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Comment on Authentication::Auth_TypeKey
user name
2006-05-30 15:25:45
Adam Ashley wrote:
> Adam Ashley (http://pear.php.net/
user/aashley) has commented on the proposal for
Authentication::Auth_TypeKey.
> 
> Comment:
> 
> I have to disagree with Martin and Lukas, this package
should be created
> seperate then wrappers created for Auth and/or
LiveUser. Same as we do
> with Net_POP3.
> 

I second that approach. First an independent main package,
then add a
wrapper-container package for Auth and/or LiveUser.

> Proposal information:
> http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=164
> 

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Comment on Authentication::Auth_TypeKey
user name
2006-05-30 15:47:38
On 5/30/06, Philippe Jausions <Philippe.Jausions11abacus.com> wrote:
> Adam Ashley wrote:
> > Adam Ashley (http://pear.php.net/
user/aashley) has commented on the proposal for
Authentication::Auth_TypeKey.
> >
> > Comment:
> >
> > I have to disagree with Martin and Lukas, this
package should be created
> > seperate then wrappers created for Auth and/or
LiveUser. Same as we do
> > with Net_POP3.
> >
>
> I second that approach. First an independent main
package, then add a
> wrapper-container package for Auth and/or LiveUser.

One does not add complexity to the other, but having to add
a wrapper
around what I consider as a wrapper already is over killed.
You can
use the containers alone (even by adding one or two
convenience
methods), the other way may not be that easy.

--Pierre

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

Comment on Authentication::Auth_TypeKey
user name
2006-05-30 16:35:55
On Tue May 30, 2006 at 11:2545AM -0400, Philippe Jausions
wrote:
> Adam Ashley wrote:
> > Adam Ashley (http://pear.php.net/
user/aashley) has commented on the proposal for
Authentication::Auth_TypeKey.
> > 
> > I have to disagree with Martin and Lukas, this
package should be created
> > seperate then wrappers created for Auth and/or
LiveUser. Same as we do
> > with Net_POP3.
> > 
> 
> I second that approach. First an independent main
package, then add a
> wrapper-container package for Auth and/or LiveUser.

This sounds sane.  I can imagine there being quite a few
people who want
to use Typekey authentication (or Bitcard or OpenID or
something
similar) without all the stuff that Auth provides.

- Martin

-- 
PEAR Development Mailing List (http://pear.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub
.php

[1-4]

about | contact  Other archives ( Real Estate discussion Medical topics )