In the latest issue of Chasseur d'Images, they test the
effectiveness
of the Antidust from different vendors. Basically their
conclusion is:
it doesn't work too well except for Olympus.
All the others work to some extend but a lot less effective
then Olympus.
Of course one can wonder how to really test this kind of
stuff.
2007/2/24, K.Takeshita <marinerone gmail.com>:
> On 2/24/07 2:58 AM, "Brendan MacRae",
<brendanmacrae1969 yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Has anyone used the dedicated Pentax sensor
cleaning
> > kit?
> >
> > Is it worth the $35 and shipping.
>
> I have had no chance of using this, but I was looking
for it here.
> There have been a few reports of actual use in Japan
and they are all
> reporting it works well. But they equally reporting
that the price is a bit
> steep .
>
> It is apparently made of silicon rubber (or something,
but don't take my
> word) which is just sticky enough to lift dust/specks
which cannot be shaken
> off by usual DR motion. The tip is square, covering
the area of 1/4 or 1/6
> of sensor (actually low pass filter) size. So if you
go over the surface
> systematically 4 times (or 6 times, I do not remember
which), you can cover
> the whole area.
>
> Since Pentax Service Centres (at least in Japan) are
using this when users
> bring their camera in, I suppose it is another proof
that it works. In
> fact, I understand that Pentax created this for their
own use first.
>
> As I said, price is rather .......
> But I suppose it is a matter of cost vs benefit.
> As for me, so far, conventional puffing method has been
sufficient but you
> never know when you need "sticky lift" to get
rid of stubborn dust When
> you need it, you need it.
>
> Ken
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML pdml.net
> http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
----------------------
K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML pdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
|