On Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:02:50 +0000, Peter Lacus wrote
> Jens,
>
> > I have a M 4/200mm as well. I have tested it
against some fine lenses,
like
> > the FA* 2.8/80-200mm
> > It's better than I thought it would be:
> >
> > http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-small/08
30-PM-200-56.jpg
> > http://jensbladt.dk/Test/images/200mm56-smal
l/1197-PTX-200mm-F56.jpg
>
> wow, that's quite a difference, are you sure it wasn't
caused by
> auto focus or something?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Peter
That really shows what such a modestly priced lens is really
capable of,
excellent IMHO.
John
------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
The information transmitted is intended only for the person
to whom it is addressed and may contain
confidential and/or privileged material. If you have
received an email in error please notify Carmel College
on info carmel.ac.uk then delete all copies of it from your
systems.
Although Carmel College scans incoming and outgoing emails
and email attachments for viruses we cannot
guarantee a communication to be free of all viruses nor
accept any responsibility for viruses.
Although Carmel College monitors incoming and outgoing
emails for inappropriate content, the college cannot
be held responsible for the views or expressions of the
author.
The views expressed may not necessarily be those of Carmel
College and Carmel College cannot be held
responsible for any loss or injury resulting from the
contents of a message.
------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML pdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
|