|
List Info
Thread: Re: Lindsey
|
|
| Re: Lindsey |
  United States |
2007-11-04 22:01:15 |
In a message dated 11/4/2007 7:42:22 P.M. Pacific Standard
Time,
pnstenquist comcast.net writes:
Sorting through the pics I shot for Lindsey's portfolio
this
afternoon. At 5'91/2". size 4, she says she was too
short and too
hefty for New York. (They want 5'11", size 2!). But
she's doing well
in Detroit modeling circles. Shot many frames. Just started
looking
through them. These are okay.
http:
//photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6602862
http:
//photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6602865
Paul
===========
Beats me how anyone 5'9" can be a size 4. Let alone...
those models have to
starve themselves.
Agree with Ann the second is too busy. Also the pose seems
sort of awkward,
turning of torso different direction from feet and she
appears to be leaning
backward a bit too.
First is fine.
Marnie aka Doe
---------------------------------------------
Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be
censored.
************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML pdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
above and follow the directions.
|
|
| Re: Lindsey |
  United States |
2007-11-04 22:10:23 |
Thanks Marnie. I agree. The second looks unnatural. Too much
twist.
Good feedback. I have about 500 more to sort through. May
need some
more help from the list .
Paul
On Nov 4, 2007, at 11:01 PM, Eactivist aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 11/4/2007 7:42:22 P.M. Pacific
Standard Time,
> pnstenquist comcast.net writes:
> Sorting through the pics I shot for Lindsey's
portfolio this
> afternoon. At 5'91/2". size 4, she says she was
too short and too
> hefty for New York. (They want 5'11", size 2!).
But she's doing well
> in Detroit modeling circles. Shot many frames. Just
started looking
> through them. These are okay.
> http:
//photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6602862
> http:
//photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6602865
> Paul
>
> ===========
> Beats me how anyone 5'9" can be a size 4. Let
alone... those
> models have to
> starve themselves.
>
> Agree with Ann the second is too busy. Also the pose
seems sort of
> awkward,
> turning of torso different direction from feet and she
appears to
> be leaning
> backward a bit too.
>
> First is fine.
>
> Marnie aka Doe
>
> ---------------------------------------------
> Warning: I am now filtering my email, so you may be
censored.
>
>
>
>
> ************************************** See what's new
at http://
> www.aol.com
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML pdml.net
> http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
directly above
> and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML pdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
above and follow the directions.
|
|
| Re: Lindsey |
  Canada |
2007-11-04 23:02:56 |
Eactivist aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 11/4/2007 7:42:22 P.M. Pacific
Standard Time,
> pnstenquist comcast.net writes:
> Sorting through the pics I shot for Lindsey's
portfolio this
> afternoon. At 5'91/2". size 4, she says she was
too short and too
> hefty for New York. (They want 5'11", size 2!).
But she's doing well
> in Detroit modeling circles. Shot many frames. Just
started looking
> through them. These are okay.
> http:
//photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6602862
> http:
//photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6602865
> Paul
>
> ===========
> Beats me how anyone 5'9" can be a size 4. Let
alone... those models have to
> starve themselves.
>
> Agree with Ann the second is too busy. Also the pose
seems sort of awkward,
> turning of torso different direction from feet and she
appears to be leaning
> backward a bit too.
>
> First is fine.
>
> Marnie aka Doe
>
It can be natural, a friend of mine's girlfriend is that
tall & thin,
and she absolutely loves food. Just has a seriously active
metabolism.
-Adam
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML pdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
above and follow the directions.
|
|
| Re: Lindsey |

|
2007-11-05 23:24:12 |
Hi!
>> Beats me how anyone 5'9" can be a size 4. Let
alone... those models have to
>> starve themselves.
>>
>> Agree with Ann the second is too busy. Also the
pose seems sort of awkward,
>> turning of torso different direction from feet and
she appears to be leaning
>> backward a bit too.
>>
>> First is fine.
>>
>> Marnie aka Doe
>>
>
> It can be natural, a friend of mine's girlfriend is
that tall & thin,
> and she absolutely loves food. Just has a seriously
active metabolism.
I must agree and provide a witness, your honor. Before
getting married I
was very thin. I am 180 cm in height (I think it is
5'11" or 6') and at
the time I was merely 65 kg in weight. I could easily hide
behind a
broomstick . And you
have to trust me, I was always hungry and ate
heartily .
May I leave the stand, your honor?
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML pdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
above and follow the directions.
|
|
| Re: Lindsey |
  United States |
2007-11-06 05:03:47 |
Congratulations, Boris. You might have a career as a New
York runway
model! )
Paul
On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:24 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
>>> Beats me how anyone 5'9" can be a size 4.
Let alone... those
>>> models have to
>>> starve themselves.
>>>
>>> Agree with Ann the second is too busy. Also the
pose seems sort
>>> of awkward,
>>> turning of torso different direction from feet
and she appears
>>> to be leaning
>>> backward a bit too.
>>>
>>> First is fine.
>>>
>>> Marnie aka Doe
>>>
>>
>> It can be natural, a friend of mine's girlfriend is
that tall & thin,
>> and she absolutely loves food. Just has a seriously
active
>> metabolism.
>
> I must agree and provide a witness, your honor. Before
getting
> married I
> was very thin. I am 180 cm in height (I think it is
5'11" or 6')
> and at
> the time I was merely 65 kg in weight. I could easily
hide behind a
> broomstick . And you
have to trust me, I was always hungry and ate
> heartily .
>
> May I leave the stand, your honor?
>
> Boris
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML pdml.net
> http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
directly above
> and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML pdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
above and follow the directions.
|
|
| Re: Lindsey |

|
2007-11-06 07:38:33 |
Paul, I might have HAD such a career. I gained 15 kilos
since that
time. Though I think male models need to be less skinny than
female
ones...
On Nov 6, 2007 1:03 PM, Paul Stenquist <pnstenquist comcast.net> wrote:
> Congratulations, Boris. You might have a career as a
New York runway
> model! )
> Paul
>
> On Nov 6, 2007, at 12:24 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> >>> Beats me how anyone 5'9" can be a
size 4. Let alone... those
> >>> models have to
> >>> starve themselves.
> >>>
> >>> Agree with Ann the second is too busy.
Also the pose seems sort
> >>> of awkward,
> >>> turning of torso different direction from
feet and she appears
> >>> to be leaning
> >>> backward a bit too.
> >>>
> >>> First is fine.
> >>>
> >>> Marnie aka Doe
> >>>
> >>
> >> It can be natural, a friend of mine's
girlfriend is that tall & thin,
> >> and she absolutely loves food. Just has a
seriously active
> >> metabolism.
> >
> > I must agree and provide a witness, your honor.
Before getting
> > married I
> > was very thin. I am 180 cm in height (I think it
is 5'11" or 6')
> > and at
> > the time I was merely 65 kg in weight. I could
easily hide behind a
> > broomstick . And you
have to trust me, I was always hungry and ate
> > heartily .
> >
> > May I leave the stand, your honor?
> >
> > Boris
> >
> >
>
> > --
> > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> > PDML pdml.net
> > http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
link directly above
> > and follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML pdml.net
> http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
directly above and follow the directions.
>
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML pdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
above and follow the directions.
|
|
[1-6]
|
|