Thanks Henk. Looking at the high res image, I'd say the
sharpest
point is the eyes. Mid body is probably about the same
plane. I shot
most of these at 2.5. I'll eventually post a whole gallery.
But I
wanted a couple with even more background blur. There is a
noticeable
difference.
On Nov 7, 2007, at 6:55 AM, Henk Terhell wrote:
> Nice portrait. I also much like my FA 50/1.4 for
portraits on digital.
> But I wonder why you choose almost open lens at f1.8.
There is
> sufficient light available for eg f2.8 and this would
bring even more
> sharpness to the front of the face of the model and
still have
> sufficient blurring of the background. The highest
sharpness
> appears now
> at mid-body.
>
> Henk
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: pdml-bounces pdml.net
[mailto:pdml-bounces pdml.net] On
>> Behalf Of Paul Stenquist
>> Sent: 07 November, 2007 12:25 PM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: PESO: f1.8
>>
>>
>> It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on
to deliver
>> a sharp
>> image almost wide open. With the FA 50/1.4, f1.8,
1/800th,
>> fill flash
>> from the 540 with a softbox attachment.
>> http:
//photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611222
>>
>> --
>> PDML
>> Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> PDML pdml.net
>>
> http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML pdml.net
> http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
directly above
> and follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML pdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
above and follow the directions.
|