Bettter than ugly tatooed girls badly photographed in cheap
underwear. I like the bokeh. The pose wasn't the best of the
shoot, but I wanted to show the only frame I shot at 1.8.
-------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "William Robb" <warobb gmail.com>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Stenquist"
> Subject: PESO: f1.8
>
>
> > It's nice to know you have a lens you can count on
to deliver a sharp
> > image almost wide open. With the FA 50/1.4, f1.8,
1/800th, fill flash
> > from the 540 with a softbox attachment.
> > http:
//photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6611222
>
> Sucky bokeh. Bob pointed out that the bokeh on the
pictures of the macro
> lens that was posted here a couple of days ago was bad,
and they were also
> taken with an FA50/1.4.
> It's to bad, because it is a nice portrait length.
> The pose is pretty contrived and her right hand are
REALLY badly placed.
>
> William Robb
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDMLpdml.net
> http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
directly above and follow
> the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDMLpdml.net
http:/
/pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
above and follow the directions.
|
